tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Altimax Arctic vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG65 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 32 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

iceGUARD iG65 leads, 61–58 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · iceGUARD iG65 or Altimax Arctic on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama iceGUARD iG65
Tire BYokohama

iceGUARD iG65

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests 70 · 1 test Owners 52 · 3 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 8 in 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    iceGUARD iG65 +6
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticiceGUARD iG65
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 61 (est.)69
    Reviews found online5153

    Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.7 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 57

    iceGUARD iG65: 60% × 69 + 40% × 52.8 = 63

    No road tests of dry for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 62

    Wet

    iceGUARD iG65 +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticiceGUARD iG65
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)72
    Reviews found online5950

    Altimax Arctic: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62

    iceGUARD iG65: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 50.1 = 63

    No road tests of wet for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    iceGUARD iG65 +1
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticiceGUARD iG65
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)71
    Reviews found online5247

    Altimax Arctic: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 60

    iceGUARD iG65: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 47 = 61

    No road tests of snow for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 53

    Comfort

    iceGUARD iG65 +5
    58
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticiceGUARD iG65
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online4652

    Altimax Arctic: 40% × 64.1 (est.) + 60% × 46.3 = 53

    iceGUARD iG65: 40% × 65.4 (est.) + 60% × 52.4 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for iceGUARD iG65. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 59

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticiceGUARD iG65
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online49–

    Altimax Arctic: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 59

    No road tests of noise for Altimax Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    iceGUARD iG65 +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticiceGUARD iG65
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5058

    Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 57

    iceGUARD iG65: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for iceGUARD iG65. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 47

    Handling (owners)

    iceGUARD iG65 +3
    50
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticiceGUARD iG65
    Reviews found online4750
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticiceGUARD iG65
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Altimax ArcticYokohama iceGUARD iG65
Relative Score 58 61
Dry 57 63
Wet 62 63
Snow 60 61
Comfort 53 58
Noise 59 –
Treadwear 57 61
Handling (owners) 47 50
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Altimax Arctic

± 8

iceGUARD iG65

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Altimax Arctic

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow, slush, and ice
  • High value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
  • Reliable wet and dry handling during cold weather months

Cons

  • Handling and responsiveness drop off compared to dedicated summer or all-season tires
  • Some users report accelerated wear once the tire reaches 50% tread life
  • Minor tendencies toward understeer during hard cornering
All owner themes in the Altimax Arctic review

Tire B iceGUARD iG65

Pros

  • Reliable traction and grip on icy road surfaces
  • Effective clearing of slush and snow from tread patterns
  • Predictable handling in severe winter conditions compared to budget-tier tires

Cons

  • Mediocre to poor performance on dry, cold pavement
  • Limited grip in deep snow conditions
  • Noticeable compromise in handling characteristics when compared to premium European winter tire segments
All owner themes in the iceGUARD iG65 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Altimax Arctic B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG65
CategoryWinter Touring tiresWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

General Altimax Arctic

Yokohama iceGUARD iG65

Narrow edge: Yokohama iceGUARD iG65 — better dry, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama iceGUARD iG65 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama iceGUARD iG65 scores 63 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama iceGUARD iG65 scores 58 vs 53 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama iceGUARD iG65 scores 61 vs 57 on treadwear.

Tire A · General Altimax Arctic
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG65
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Altimax Arctic or iceGUARD iG65?

Which is better in the wet, Altimax Arctic or iceGUARD iG65?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 63 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Altimax Arctic or iceGUARD iG65?

Yokohama iceGUARD iG65, 63 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Altimax Arctic or iceGUARD iG65?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 61 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Altimax Arctic or iceGUARD iG65?

Yokohama iceGUARD iG65, 58 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Altimax Arctic or iceGUARD iG65?

Yokohama iceGUARD iG65, 61 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology