General AltiMAX RT looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Michelin Defender looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

General AltiMAX RT vs Michelin Defender — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

Defender is ahead, 72–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General AltiMAX RT
Tire AGeneral

AltiMAX RT

All-Season Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 11 reviews

Michelin Defender
Tire BMichelin

Defender

Summer Premium Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Defender +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTDefender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6476

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65

    Defender: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 73

    No road tests of dry for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Defender. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Defender +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTDefender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6674

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67

    Defender: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73

    No road tests of wet for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Defender. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTDefender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 61

    No road tests of snow for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Defender +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTDefender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6273

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65

    Defender: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for AltiMAX RT or Defender. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTDefender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online65–

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    No road tests of noise for AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Defender +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTDefender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6472

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    Defender: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Defender. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    Defender +13
    77
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTDefender
    Reviews found online6477
Scores at a glance
General AltiMAX RT vs Michelin Defender: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral AltiMAX RTMichelin Defender
Relative Score 66 72
Dry 65 73
Wet 67 73
Snow 61 –
Comfort 65 71
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 65 69
Handling (owners) 64 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

AltiMAX RT

Defender

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AltiMAX RT

Pros

  • Affordable price point offering high value
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality suitable for large sedans
  • Reliable all-around traction in both wet and dry conditions

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather performance reported by some users
  • Premature tread wear down to 30,000 miles in isolated experiences
All owner themes in the AltiMAX RT review

Tire B Defender

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Strong tread life and durability over several years
  • Reliable grip on dry pavement

Cons

  • Susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain
  • Limited traction in deep or severe snow
  • Audible squealing during aggressive dry-pavement acceleration
All owner themes in the Defender review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General AltiMAX RT B · Michelin Defender
CategoryAll-Season Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG440 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

General AltiMAX RT

Michelin Defender

Winner: Michelin Defender — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. General AltiMAX RT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Defender rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Defender scores 77 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Defender scores 73 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Defender scores 73 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Defender scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · General AltiMAX RT
Tire B · Michelin Defender

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AltiMAX RT or Defender?

Which is better in the wet, AltiMAX RT or Defender?

Michelin Defender, 73 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, AltiMAX RT or Defender?

Michelin Defender, 73 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, AltiMAX RT or Defender?

Michelin Defender, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, AltiMAX RT or Defender?

Michelin Defender, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology