Michelin Defender looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-headUpdated
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Michelin Defender — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 33 + 0 road tests and 21,761 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)
“I have had the Cross Climate 2 tires on my VW All Track now for about a year and thought I would share some findings about them. 1. They are QUIET on the road. Looking at the tread, you might think they are noisy but they are not! Run as quiet as a normal tire. 2. They give excellent traction and handling on dry, wet and snowy roads. This past winter, I had two occasions to drive on roads covered with 6-10" of snow. Excellent traction. 3. They wear very well! After about 12,000 miles, they hardly show any wear. I expect to get about 50,000-60,000 miles out of these tires. 4. They do exact a mileage penalty. I lost about 2 mpg overall since putting on these tires. However, I do not mind that considering the excellent traction I get from them. 5. They tend to pick up stones in the tread, particularly after the great state of Pennsylvania in its wisdom covers the roads before, during and after a snowstorm with gravel. Overall, this tire is a winner. Handling is excellent as is wear and traction. I would recommend this tire to anyone who wants these features and wants to leave a set of tires on their car year around.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
95
Dry
No comparison
–
Why this score
Source
CrossClimate 2
Defender
Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / – tests
99
–
Reviews found online
88
–
CrossClimate 2:60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.3 = 95
87
Wet
No comparison
–
Why this score
Source
CrossClimate 2
Defender
Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / – tests
83
–
Reviews found online
92
–
CrossClimate 2:60% × 83.1 + 40% × 91.8 = 87
91
Snow
No comparison
–
Why this score
Source
CrossClimate 2
Defender
Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / – tests
99
–
Reviews found online
79
–
CrossClimate 2:60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.6 = 91
79
Comfort
No comparison
–
Why this score
Source
CrossClimate 2
Defender
Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests
67
–
Reviews found online
86
–
CrossClimate 2:40% × 67.1 + 60% × 86.1 = 79
79
Noise
No comparison
–
Why this score
Source
CrossClimate 2
Defender
Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests
77
–
Reviews found online
83
–
CrossClimate 2:60% × 76.9 + 40% × 82.5 = 79
84
Treadwear
No comparison
–
Why this score
Source
CrossClimate 2
Defender
Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests
81
–
Reviews found online
88
–
CrossClimate 2:60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84
82
Handling (owners)
No comparison
–
Why this score
Source
CrossClimate 2
Defender
Reviews found online
82
–
90
Efficiency
No comparison
–
Why this score
Source
CrossClimate 2
Defender
Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests
90
–
Scores at a glance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Michelin Defender: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Michelin Defender
Relative Score
88
–
Dry
95
–
Wet
87
–
Snow
91
–
Comfort
79
–
Noise
79
–
Treadwear
84
–
Handling (owners)
82
–
Efficiency
90
–
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
88
/ 100
± 4
CrossClimate 2
–
/ 100
±
Defender
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossClimate 2
Pros
Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
Long-lasting tread wear and durability
Cons
Higher initial purchase price
Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Positive
The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design
Based on 762 community posts
Tire B
Michelin Defender
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
Attribute
A · Michelin CrossClimate 2
B · Michelin Defender
Category
All Season
Summer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle type
Passenger Car / Crossover
Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available
92
—
Rim diameters
15″ – 21″
—
Tread depth
9 - 10/32″
—
UTQG
640 B A
—
Treadwear warranty
60,000 mi
—
Sidewall
Black Side Wall
—
Max pressure
50 - 51 psi
—
Which one should you actually buy?
88
/ 100
Michelin CrossClimate 2
–
/ 100
Michelin Defender
Only Michelin CrossClimate 2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology