Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

General AltiMAX RT43 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1,371 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

AltiMAX RT43 is ahead, 68–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General AltiMAX RT43
Tire AGeneral

AltiMAX RT43

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 1,371 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I have the General Altimax RT43 on 19s as my winter tires, and they are perfectly fine. For sure louder than oem, because there is no foam, but for wear, tear and handling, perfectly fine. I am not racing anyone or driving aggressively with those tires on anyway.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    AltiMAX RT43 +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RT43Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6858

    AltiMAX RT43: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for AltiMAX RT43. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 70

    Wet

    AltiMAX RT43 +13
    57
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RT43Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7053

    AltiMAX RT43: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for AltiMAX RT43. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 64

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RT43Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online60–

    AltiMAX RT43: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 64

    No road tests of snow for AltiMAX RT43. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    AltiMAX RT43 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RT43Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6562

    AltiMAX RT43: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 67

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for AltiMAX RT43 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RT43Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online73–

    AltiMAX RT43: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 70

    No road tests of noise for AltiMAX RT43. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    AltiMAX RT43 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RT43Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6764

    AltiMAX RT43: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 67.3 = 69

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    AltiMAX RT43 +7
    58
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RT43Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online6558
Scores at a glance
General AltiMAX RT43 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral AltiMAX RT43Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 68 61
Dry 68 61
Wet 70 57
Snow 64 –
Comfort 67 65
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 69 65
Handling (owners) 65 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

AltiMAX RT43

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AltiMAX RT43

Pros

  • Excellent value and lower price point compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality with minimal road noise
  • Strong wet and dry traction with dependable hydroplaning resistance

Cons

  • Occasional balancing difficulties or vibrations reported by some users
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly spongy handling or reduced cornering sharpness
  • Winter and snow performance can diminish notably as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the AltiMAX RT43 review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General AltiMAX RT43

Positive

Community sentiment for the General AltiMAX RT43 is predominantly positive, with reviewers praising its comfort, strong winter and wet weather capability, and solid value as a budget-to-midrange touring tire. However, critics frequently point out soft sidewalls, tramlining on grooved surfaces, and mediocre handling or dry grip under aggressive driving. Tread life reports are mixed, with many reaching 50,000 to 80,000 miles while others report premature wear around 30,000 miles.

forbbodiesonly.com ·2022-05-23

“While not a muscle car, my 96 Ford Ranger has 14x7 aluminum wheels. I ran a set of 225/70-14 Coopers on it with no problem. I got about 35K miles, if I remember correctly. I replaced them with General Altima RT43's when they wore out. Mainly just because the Generals were a few bucks cheaper on my little beater truck. But, I am liking these General tires pretty well too. They have white letters, but they don't look as "muscle car" as the Coopers. I will probably get a set of the Coopers in the near future for the 14"road wheels on my 67 Coronet. I currently have BFG's that look perfect. But, I bought them in 2003....”

bobistheoilguy.com ·5 upvotes ·2022-06-22

“I'll be passing on this; I was very disappointed in the RT43. Very soft sidewalls, dry grip was very subpar, wet grip was decent, hydroplane resistance was pretty good. It also tramlined and followed grooves like crazy - worse than the Yoko A13C that came OEM on the Evo - which was the previous top tramlining tire I used.”

fitfreak.net

“I will start by saying that I ordered a set of 4 from TireRack and although I found them just a little bit cheaper on other sites (after the fact), I have no complaints about it as I still only paid ~$70-ish per tire and received them within two days. Secondly, being that I live in New England, wet and snow traction is very high on my list of priorities and lucky for me, it snowed heavily 3 days after having them mounted. I was entering a parking lot that had not been plowed yet and know for a FACT my car would have just spun tires and left me stuck. But not with these. The car seemed to shake left and right a little until it made it to the pavement and easily made it through. I have never felt so confident in the snow before with my little Fit. And then last night. My wife and I went out to dinner and I decided to move my car as I spotted a better parking spot which required a fast and illegal u-turn. I pressed the accelerator hard which typically would squeal the tires but these gripped immediately and the Fit just took off. I strongly recommend them! Oh, and they're rated for a supposed 70,000 miles.”

Top themes
#value and pricing#snow and winter traction#wet grip and hydroplaning#soft ride comfort#soft sidewalls and handling#tramlining on grooved roads#treadwear and longevity

Based on 261 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General AltiMAX RT43 B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG600 - 700 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

General AltiMAX RT43

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: General AltiMAX RT43 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General AltiMAX RT43 scores 70 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General AltiMAX RT43 scores 68 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General AltiMAX RT43 scores 65 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General AltiMAX RT43 scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · General AltiMAX RT43
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AltiMAX RT43 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, AltiMAX RT43 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

General AltiMAX RT43, 70 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, AltiMAX RT43 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

General AltiMAX RT43, 68 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, AltiMAX RT43 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, AltiMAX RT43 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

General AltiMAX RT43, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology