Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 5 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
General Exclaim UHP vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 5 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 79–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 83 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Defender LTX M/S +1779Why this score
Source Exclaim UHP Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 59 84 Exclaim UHP: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 62
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 84.3 = 79
No road tests of dry for Exclaim UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
65
Wet
Defender LTX M/S +1782Why this score
Source Exclaim UHP Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 79 (est.) Reviews found online 62 86 Exclaim UHP: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 65
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 78.9 (est.) + 40% × 85.6 = 82
No road tests of wet for Exclaim UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
54
Snow
Defender LTX M/S +2074Why this score
Source Exclaim UHP Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 43 77 Exclaim UHP: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 42.5 = 54
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 74
No road tests of snow for Exclaim UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
Defender LTX M/S +1375Why this score
Source Exclaim UHP Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 59 78 Exclaim UHP: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.6 = 62
Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.6 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Exclaim UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
62
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Exclaim UHP Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 56 – Exclaim UHP: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 62
No road tests of noise for Exclaim UHP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Defender LTX M/S +1380Why this score
Source Exclaim UHP Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 67 86 Exclaim UHP: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 86.3 = 80
No road tests of treadwear for Exclaim UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Defender LTX M/S +2082Why this score
Source Exclaim UHP Defender LTX M/S Reviews found online 62 82
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Exclaim UHP | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 79 |
| Dry | 62 | 79 |
| Wet | 65 | 82 |
| Snow | 54 | 74 |
| Comfort | 62 | 75 |
| Noise | 62 | – |
| Treadwear | 67 | 80 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Exclaim UHP
79
/ 100
Defender LTX M/S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Exclaim UHP
Pros
- Exceptional treadwear and long tire life for a performance-oriented category
- Great value for the price paid
- Good dry traction and excellent wet traction
Cons
- Below-average dry grip compared to mid-range UHP standards
- Poor performance in snow requiring slow and cautious driving
- Increases in noise levels as the tire wears down
Tire B Defender LTX M/S
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, often exceeding 60,000 miles
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride quality
- Strong traction and secure handling in wet, dry, and moderate snow conditions
Cons
- High initial purchase price compared to competitors
- Subpar off-road performance, specifically struggling in mud, sand, and loose gravel
- Limited ice performance compared to dedicated winter tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Exclaim UHP | B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 380 A A | 720 - 800 B A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
General Exclaim UHP
79
/ 100
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better snow, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. General Exclaim UHP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 74 vs 54 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 62 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 62 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 65 on wet.
Tire A · General Exclaim UHP
Tire B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Exclaim UHP or Defender LTX M/S?
Which is better in the wet, Exclaim UHP or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 82 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Exclaim UHP or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Exclaim UHP or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 74 vs 54 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Exclaim UHP or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Exclaim UHP or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 80 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology