Head-to-head Updated

General Exclaim UHP vs Nitto NT05 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 43 owner reviews. How we score

Exclaim UHP is ahead, 62–50

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Exclaim UHP
Tire AGeneral

Exclaim UHP

Summer High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 5 reviews

Nitto NT05
Tire BNitto

NT05

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 43 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Level
    62
    Why this score
    SourceExclaim UHPNT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5960

    Exclaim UHP: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 62

    NT05: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62

    No road tests of dry for Exclaim UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Exclaim UHP +24
    41
    Why this score
    SourceExclaim UHPNT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online6231

    Exclaim UHP: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 65

    NT05: 60% × 48.7 (est.) + 40% × 30.5 = 41

    No road tests of wet for Exclaim UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 54

    Snow

    Exclaim UHP +16
    38
    Why this score
    SourceExclaim UHPNT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online4315

    Exclaim UHP: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 42.5 = 54

    NT05: 60% × 52.7 (est.) + 40% × 14.7 = 38

    No road tests of snow for Exclaim UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    Exclaim UHP +14
    48
    Why this score
    SourceExclaim UHPNT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5938

    Exclaim UHP: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.6 = 62

    NT05: 40% × 62.4 (est.) + 60% × 37.7 = 48

    No road tests of comfort for Exclaim UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    Level
    62
    Why this score
    SourceExclaim UHPNT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5654

    Exclaim UHP: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 62

    NT05: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Exclaim UHP or NT05. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Exclaim UHP +17
    50
    Why this score
    SourceExclaim UHPNT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online6740

    Exclaim UHP: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67

    NT05: 60% × 57 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for Exclaim UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Exclaim UHP +7
    55
    Why this score
    SourceExclaim UHPNT05
    Reviews found online6255
Scores at a glance
General Exclaim UHP vs Nitto NT05: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Exclaim UHPNitto NT05
Relative Score 62 50
Dry 62 62
Wet 65 41
Snow 54 38
Comfort 62 48
Noise 62 62
Treadwear 67 50
Handling (owners) 62 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Exclaim UHP

± 8

NT05

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Exclaim UHP

Pros

  • Exceptional treadwear and long tire life for a performance-oriented category
  • Great value for the price paid
  • Good dry traction and excellent wet traction

Cons

  • Below-average dry grip compared to mid-range UHP standards
  • Poor performance in snow requiring slow and cautious driving
  • Increases in noise levels as the tire wears down
All owner themes in the Exclaim UHP review

Tire B NT05

Pros

  • Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
  • Predictable and progressive handling limits
  • Good value and competitive price point for a performance tire

Cons

  • Poor performance and traction in heavy rain or wet conditions
  • Can be noisy or develop a whistling sound at highway speeds
  • May overheat or struggle under extreme track conditions for prolonged sessions
All owner themes in the NT05 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Exclaim UHP B · Nitto NT05
CategorySummer High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available223
Rim diameters17″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″7.2/32″
UTQG380 A A200 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General Exclaim UHP

Nitto NT05

Winner: General Exclaim UHP — better wet, treadwear and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. General Exclaim UHP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Exclaim UHP scores 65 vs 41 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Exclaim UHP scores 67 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

General Exclaim UHP scores 54 vs 38 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

General Exclaim UHP scores 62 vs 48 on comfort.

Tire A · General Exclaim UHP
Tire B · Nitto NT05

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Exclaim UHP or NT05?

Which is better in the wet, Exclaim UHP or NT05?

General Exclaim UHP, 65 vs 41 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Exclaim UHP or NT05?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 62 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Exclaim UHP or NT05?

General Exclaim UHP, 54 vs 38 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Exclaim UHP or NT05?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 62 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Exclaim UHP or NT05?

General Exclaim UHP, 62 vs 48 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Exclaim UHP or NT05?

General Exclaim UHP, 67 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology