Head-to-head Updated

General G-MAX AS-05 vs Kumho Ecsta PA51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 805 + 165 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: G-MAX AS-05 70, Ecsta PA51 69.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General G-MAX AS-05
Tire AGeneral

G-MAX AS-05

All Season

± 6

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 805 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“18 ST on freshly refinished snowflakes and general g-max as-05 tires. Tire rack mobile install is awesome.”

Kumho Ecsta PA51
Tire BKumho

Ecsta PA51

All Season

± 8

Tests – · 1 test Owners 70 · 165 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    G-MAX AS-05 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX AS-05Ecsta PA51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7170

    G-MAX AS-05: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 70

    Ecsta PA51: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69

    No road tests of dry for G-MAX AS-05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX AS-05Ecsta PA51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7171

    G-MAX AS-05: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71

    Ecsta PA51: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    No road tests of wet for G-MAX AS-05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 59

    Snow

    Ecsta PA51 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX AS-05Ecsta PA51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5159

    G-MAX AS-05: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 59

    Ecsta PA51: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 64

    No road tests of snow for G-MAX AS-05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    G-MAX AS-05 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX AS-05Ecsta PA51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6665

    G-MAX AS-05: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.8 = 67

    Ecsta PA51: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.7 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for G-MAX AS-05 or Ecsta PA51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Ecsta PA51 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX AS-05Ecsta PA51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6874

    G-MAX AS-05: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 67

    Ecsta PA51: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 69

    No road tests of noise for G-MAX AS-05 or Ecsta PA51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    G-MAX AS-05 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX AS-05Ecsta PA51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7770
    Reviews found online7374
    Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–087%67%

    G-MAX AS-05: 60% × 77 + 40% × 72.7 = 75

    Ecsta PA51: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 74.4 = 72

  7. 70

    Handling (owners)

    G-MAX AS-05 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX AS-05Ecsta PA51
    Reviews found online7067
Scores at a glance
General G-MAX AS-05 vs Kumho Ecsta PA51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral G-MAX AS-05Kumho Ecsta PA51
Relative Score 70 69
Dry 70 69
Wet 71 71
Snow 59 64
Comfort 67 66
Noise 67 69
Treadwear 75 72
Handling (owners) 70 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

G-MAX AS-05

± 8

Ecsta PA51

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, General G-MAX AS-05 finished ahead 1 times and Kumho Ecsta PA51 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryG-MAX AS-05Ecsta PA51ΔHead-to-head
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Treadwear 87% 67% +20.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/19 #7/19 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A G-MAX AS-05

Pros

  • Exceptional value and price point compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Sharp steering response and sporty handling

Cons

  • Slightly mushy or delayed response at the absolute cornering limit for aggressive drivers
  • Mediocre performance in deep snow
  • Occasional reports of highway tramlining or a firmer ride due to stiff sidewalls
All owner themes in the G-MAX AS-05 review

Tire B Ecsta PA51

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
  • Some reports of increased road noise over time
  • Limited availability in certain niche sizes
All owner themes in the Ecsta PA51 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General G-MAX AS-05

Positive

Community members widely regard the General G-Max AS-05 as an outstanding value for an ultra-high performance all-season tire, often praising its responsive steering, strong dry handling, and wet grip as a cheaper alternative to Continental and Michelin. However, opinions on road noise are polarized, ranging from quiet to noticeably loud, and snow/winter performance is frequently cited as mediocre or limited to light conditions.

r/BoltEV ·7 upvotes ·2019-03-16

“General Tire G-MAX AS-05 I just ordered a set of General Tire G-MAX AS-05 for my Bolt. Tirerack.com says that this is an "Ultra High Performance All-Season" tire. With 28,000 miles of wear on the factory tires, I can feel it starting to hydroplane in heavy rain. I'm swapping before something worse than "starting to hydroplane" happens. And I'm looking forward to it being a lot more fun to drive. :-) General Tire G-MAX AS-05”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2018-05-16

“I had the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3's on my GTI and didn't care for them much. Overrated, period. The + version might be better? I have 4 Continental SureContact RX's on my GTI and they are the best UHP all-season tires I've had. They aren't known for being superb in class in the snow like the Conti DWS06's are. But they grip excellent in the rain and perform great cold or hot. Every other all-season I've had gave up traction in hot summer weather except for the Conti's on my car and the Generals Gmax AS-05 on my wifes Audi. Those Generals are made in Portugal by Continental. They have a tad more road noise than my tires but are better otherwise. I'm done assuming Michelin and top tier high dollar tires are always better.”

subaruoutback.org ·5 upvotes ·2021-10-05

“I'm a tire dealer. If you can get the General GMax AS05 in your size... Get them. They are so underrated. Im on my 2nd set. That is the only time I've repeated a tire purchase. The most interesting thing about them is the noise at extreme cornering. There isnt any squeal. They make a low pitched hum. And they are cheap. General is a sister of Continental .”

Top themes
#value and pricing#wet traction performance#road noise levels#light snow capability#steering response handling#Continental brand relationship#tread wear longevity

Based on 88 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PA51

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General G-MAX AS-05 B · Kumho Ecsta PA51
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available113
Rim diameters19″16″ – 19″
Tread depth10/32″10.5/32″
UTQG500 A - AA A500 A A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi45,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General G-MAX AS-05

Kumho Ecsta PA51

Too close to call: General G-MAX AS-05 and Kumho Ecsta PA51 are within 2 points overall. General G-MAX AS-05 is stronger on treadwear. Kumho Ecsta PA51 is stronger on snow.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 64 vs 59 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General G-MAX AS-05 scores 75 vs 72 on treadwear.

Tire A · General G-MAX AS-05
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PA51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

G-MAX AS-05 or Ecsta PA51?

Which is better in the wet, G-MAX AS-05 or Ecsta PA51?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, G-MAX AS-05 or Ecsta PA51?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, G-MAX AS-05 or Ecsta PA51?

Kumho Ecsta PA51, 64 vs 59 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, G-MAX AS-05 or Ecsta PA51?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, G-MAX AS-05 or Ecsta PA51?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, G-MAX AS-05 or Ecsta PA51?

General G-MAX AS-05, 75 vs 72 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology