Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber APT vs General Grabber A/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 82 + 17 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber APT leads, 68–64 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber APT
Tire AGeneral

Grabber APT

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 82 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

General Grabber A/T
Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/T

All-Terrain tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 17 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Grabber APT +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6762

    Grabber APT: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67

    Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Grabber APT +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7564

    Grabber APT: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Grabber A/T: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 66

    No road tests of wet for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Snow

    Grabber APT +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6460

    Grabber APT: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 67

    Grabber A/T: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 64

    No road tests of snow for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Grabber APT +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6059

    Grabber APT: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.2 = 63

    Grabber A/T: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 59.3 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 61

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online53–

    Grabber APT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Grabber APT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Grabber APT +6
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6963

    Grabber APT: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 68.7 = 70

    Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber A/T +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/T
    Reviews found online5863
Scores at a glance
General Grabber APT vs General Grabber A/T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber APTGeneral Grabber A/T
Relative Score 68 64
Dry 67 64
Wet 74 66
Snow 67 64
Comfort 63 62
Noise 61 –
Treadwear 70 64
Handling (owners) 58 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber APT

± 8

Grabber A/T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber APT

Pros

  • Excellent traction in wet, snowy, and light off-road conditions
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for an all-terrain tire
  • Attractive, rugged aesthetic that enhances vehicle appearance

Cons

  • Difficulty in achieving proper wheel balance, leading to vibrations
  • Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Tendency to pick up and retain gravel in tread grooves
All owner themes in the Grabber APT review

Tire B Grabber A/T

Pros

  • Excellent off-road traction on mud, grass, gravel, and farm tracks
  • Good performance in snow and winter conditions
  • Reasonably quiet and smooth on-road manners compared to more aggressive alternatives

Cons

  • Poor or slippery grip on wet tarmac, raising safety concerns for some users
  • Balancing issues reported by multiple owners
  • Weak sidewall durability or vulnerability to punctures on low-profile applications
All owner themes in the Grabber A/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber APT B · General Grabber A/T
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available25—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth12 - 16/32″—
UTQG360 - 740 A - AA A - B—
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 90 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber APT

General Grabber A/T

Narrow edge: General Grabber APT — better wet, treadwear and dry. Where the General Grabber A/T is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. General Grabber A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber APT scores 74 vs 66 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber APT scores 70 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber APT scores 67 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber APT scores 67 vs 64 on snow.

Tire A · General Grabber APT
Tire B · General Grabber A/T

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber APT or Grabber A/T?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber APT or Grabber A/T?

General Grabber APT, 74 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber APT or Grabber A/T?

General Grabber APT, 67 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber APT or Grabber A/T?

General Grabber APT, 67 vs 64 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber APT or Grabber A/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Grabber APT or Grabber A/T?

General Grabber APT, 70 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology