tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HP71 vs General Grabber A/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Grabber A/T is ahead, 65–51

Check price on Amazon · Grabber A/T or Crugen HP71 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 273 reviews

“Tire Recommendations Got this car recently as CPO with Kumho Crugen HP71 (non EV) tires, don’t like them much although I’m getting 5.12 mi/kWh used primarily for commute about 42 miles round trip in heavy traffic. But the problem for me is the noise I drive over 8 miles in a bridge and I feel like I know every bridge joint along with the loud hum on the coarse sections enough to disturb my audiobooks. Not doing Primacy, as many of you say they don’t last, and my current Kumho seem to be going similar to OE. Mixed reviews on the Hankook iON evo. Some say great tread life, some say it wears fast. Sounds quiet but stiff ride comes up a lot. Anyone run these on an Ioniq 5 or similar RWD EV? Also looking at Defender 2, Turanza EverDrive, Scorpion AS4, TrueContact Tour 54. Real experience with any of these on an EV, RWD especially. Open to anything else too. Thanks”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 47

    Dry

    Grabber A/T +17
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Grabber A/T
    Reviews found online3663
  2. 54

    Wet

    Grabber A/T +12
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Grabber A/T
    Reviews found online4965
  3. 57

    Snow

    Grabber A/T +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Grabber A/T
    Reviews found online4857
  4. 55

    Comfort

    Grabber A/T +11
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Grabber A/T
    Reviews found online4062
  5. 57

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Grabber A/T
    Reviews found online43–
  6. 44

    Treadwear

    Grabber A/T +21
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Grabber A/T
    Reviews found online3064
  7. 55

    Handling

    Grabber A/T +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Grabber A/T
    Reviews found online5564
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HP71General Grabber A/T
Relative Score 51 65
Dry 47 64
Wet 54 66
Snow 57 62
Comfort 55 66
Noise 57 –
Treadwear 44 65
Handling 55 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Crugen HP71

Grabber A/T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

Tire B Grabber A/T

Pros

  • Excellent off-road traction on mud, grass, gravel, and farm tracks
  • Good performance in snow and winter conditions
  • Reasonably quiet and smooth on-road manners compared to more aggressive alternatives

Cons

  • Poor or slippery grip on wet tarmac, raising safety concerns for some users
  • Balancing issues reported by multiple owners
  • Weak sidewall durability or vulnerability to punctures on low-profile applications
All owner themes in the Grabber A/T review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinion on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is heavily mixed, largely split between appreciation for its comfortable, quiet ride and affordability compared to premium brands, versus frequent complaints about rapid tread wear, particularly on heavier electric vehicles. While many drivers praise initial grip, handling, and value, concerns persist regarding longevity, internal acoustic foam separation issues, and premature wear relative to advertised mileage warranties.

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2026-08-04

“Kumho Crugen HP71 vs HP71 EV? Ended up with a screw in the shoulder of my rear driver side tire, leaking around 1PSI per hour, most likely not in a repairable spot. My current tires are about a year old, have around 13k miles on them, and tread wear on them is between 7/32 and 8/32. Purchased a used (no plugs or patched/never repaired) tire with 8/32 tread remaining thinking it would be a direct swap but once it got here I realized that the original tires are Kumho Crugen HP71 EV tires as opposed to this one being a Kumho Crugen HP71 (both 235/55/r19/101H). The car is an AWD Kia EV 6, so separate motors for front axel and rear axel but more simple setup than a fancy ICE AWD. At the rate of wear on these I probably have around 1.5-2 years (~20k miles) remaining on the original three tires before they will need to be replaced anyways. Is the difference between the regular HP71 and HP71 EV so different that I can't use this tire for a year? I believe the EV version has some foam in it to reduce noise, and supposedly it has 24% lower rolling resistance but it seems like that marketing is based on a generic tire and not necessarily the non-EV HP71 tire. Thanks!”
r/AskAMechanic ·1 upvote ·2026-07-26

“I need a new tire, right? 215/55R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 tire showing cords on the outer sidewall. I need a new tire, right? Edit: I’m thinking about replacing just this one tire, 2023 CX-30 AWD. Tires were new Oct 2025 and have 7mm tread depth left. According to the spec sheet, this new tire would have 7.9mm of depth. Can I get away with one tire? Edit 2: Existing vs new tires would have ~1mm of difference in tread depth Read more”
r/nissanpathfinder ·1 upvote ·2026-05-31

“2026 Pathfinder Tires: 255/60R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 vs 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra I think I settled on a configuration that suits our needs but it comes with the upgraded 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra tires/rims. The 20" wheels look great but I think the 18" Kumho's with the taller side will be better for the sometimes rough roads (potholes, large bumps, torn up city streets) we drive and for lighter towing. I highly doubt the dealer will exchange them for me but first I wanted to ask if I'm just overthinking this or should I try to trade down for the 18s. For reference I'm completely satisfied driving an outback with 225/60R18 Yokohama Avid GT (controlled, planted) and not happy with a highlander with 235/65R18 (too soft, uncontrolled). I get that these are different vehicles, suspensions, center of gravity, but hopefully it gives you a better idea. Thanks Edit: clarification on towing: fiberglass trailer like Scamp/Casita”
Top themes
#Tread wear and longevity#Ride comfort and noise#EV performance and weight#Pricing and value#Acoustic foam issues#Handling and traction

Based on 34 community posts

Tire B

General Grabber A/T

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP71 B · General Grabber A/T
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available63—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth9.9/32″—
UTQG640 A A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HP71

General Grabber A/T

Winner: General Grabber A/T — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber A/T scores 65 vs 44 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber A/T scores 64 vs 47 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber A/T scores 66 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber A/T scores 66 vs 55 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber A/T
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

65

Leads

Grabber A/T

Amazon