tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber Arctic vs Hankook Winter i*cept RS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Winter i*cept RS leads, 70–67 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Winter i*cept RS or Grabber Arctic on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AGeneral

Grabber Arctic

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 18 reviews

Best test result: #4 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires (overall ranking)

Tire BHankook

Winter i*cept RS

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 6 reviews

Best test result: #9 of 42 in 2012 Auto Bild 42 Winter Tyre Braking Test (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Winter i*cept RS +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinter i*cept RS
    Reviews found online6269
  2. 71

    Wet

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinter i*cept RS
    Reviews found online7172
  3. 75

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinter i*cept RS
    Reviews found online79–
  4. 68

    Comfort

    Winter i*cept RS +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinter i*cept RS
    Reviews found online6771
  5. 65

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinter i*cept RS
    Reviews found online63–
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Winter i*cept RS +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinter i*cept RS
    Reviews found online6973
  7. –

    Handling

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinter i*cept RS
    Reviews found online–72
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber ArcticHankook Winter i*cept RS
Relative Score 67 70
Dry 64 69
Wet 71 71
Snow 75 –
Comfort 68 70
Noise 65 –
Treadwear 67 70
Handling – 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber Arctic

Winter i*cept RS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryGrabber ArcticWinter i*cept RSΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 57% #4/8 · 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires 11% #9/42 · 2012 Auto Bild 42 Winter Tyre Braking Test +46.0 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber Arctic

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and handling in snow and slush
  • Great value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
  • Reliable cold-weather performance on wet and icy surfaces

Cons

  • Moderate road noise when studded or on dry/slightly wet pavement
  • Average performance on hard-packed ice unless studded
  • Directional/rotational tread pattern may limit tire rotation options for some drivers
All owner themes in the Grabber Arctic review

Tire B Winter i*cept RS

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and performance in medium to heavy snow conditions
  • Low rolling resistance contributing to great fuel economy
  • Durable wear rate given the winter conditions

Cons

  • Very soft rubber compound reduces performance and handling on dry, hot roads
  • Less suited for extended high-speed motorway driving
All owner themes in the Winter i*cept RS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber Arctic B · Hankook Winter i*cept RS
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available617
Rim diameters16″ – 20″13″ – 16″
Tread depth12/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber Arctic

Hankook Winter i*cept RS

Winner: Hankook Winter i*cept RS — better dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Winter i*cept RS scores 69 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Winter i*cept RS scores 70 vs 67 on treadwear.

Tire A · General Grabber Arctic
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*cept RS
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Narrow edge

Winter i*cept RS

Amazon