Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 6 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Winter i*cept RS vs Laufenn I Fit Ice — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
Winter i*cept RS is ahead, 71–55
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Winter i*cept RS +1158Why this score
Source Winter i*cept RS I Fit Ice Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 70 52 Winter i*cept RS: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 69
I Fit Ice: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58
No road tests of dry for Winter i*cept RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
Winter i*cept RS +1558Why this score
Source Winter i*cept RS I Fit Ice Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 73 53 Winter i*cept RS: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 73
I Fit Ice: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 58
No road tests of wet for Winter i*cept RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison65Why this score
Source Winter i*cept RS I Fit Ice Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online – 62 I Fit Ice: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65
No road tests of snow for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
70
Comfort
Winter i*cept RS +1357Why this score
Source Winter i*cept RS I Fit Ice Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 70 52 Winter i*cept RS: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70 = 70
I Fit Ice: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.5 = 57
No road tests of comfort for Winter i*cept RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
72
Treadwear
Winter i*cept RS +2349Why this score
Source Winter i*cept RS I Fit Ice Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 75 38 Winter i*cept RS: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72
I Fit Ice: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.8 = 49
No road tests of treadwear for Winter i*cept RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Winter i*cept RS +2348Why this score
Source Winter i*cept RS I Fit Ice Reviews found online 71 48
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Winter i*cept RS | Laufenn I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 55 |
| Dry | 69 | 58 |
| Wet | 73 | 58 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 70 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 49 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 48 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Winter i*cept RS
55
/ 100
I Fit Ice
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Winter i*cept RS | I Fit Ice | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #10/48 2014 50 Winter Tyre Braking Overview | #16/17 2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Winter i*cept RS
Pros
- Exceptional grip and performance in medium to heavy snow conditions
- Low rolling resistance contributing to great fuel economy
- Durable wear rate given the winter conditions
Cons
- Very soft rubber compound reduces performance and handling on dry, hot roads
- Less suited for extended high-speed motorway driving
Tire B I Fit Ice
Pros
- Excellent traction and braking on compacted snow, deep snow, and ice
- High value and budget-friendly price point
- Surprisingly quiet and smooth ride for some users in cold conditions
Cons
- Poor grip and dangerous slippage on wet roads and rain
- Excessive road noise and humming
- Subpar dry handling and soft feel during warmer temperatures
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Winter i*cept RS | B · Laufenn I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 17 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 16″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Hankook Winter i*cept RS
55
/ 100
Laufenn I Fit Ice
Winner: Hankook Winter i*cept RS — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Winter i*cept RS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Laufenn I Fit Ice rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Winter i*cept RS scores 72 vs 49 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Winter i*cept RS scores 71 vs 48 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Winter i*cept RS scores 73 vs 58 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Winter i*cept RS scores 70 vs 57 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Winter i*cept RS
Tire B · Laufenn I Fit Ice
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Winter i*cept RS or I Fit Ice?
Which is better in the wet, Winter i*cept RS or I Fit Ice?
Hankook Winter i*cept RS, 73 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Winter i*cept RS or I Fit Ice?
Hankook Winter i*cept RS, 69 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Winter i*cept RS or I Fit Ice?
Hankook Winter i*cept RS, 70 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Winter i*cept RS or I Fit Ice?
Hankook Winter i*cept RS, 72 vs 49 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology