Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber Arctic vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

iceGUARD iG51v leads, 71–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    iceGUARD iG51v +8
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticiceGUARD iG51v
    Reviews found online6274
  2. 71

    Wet

    iceGUARD iG51v +7
    78
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticiceGUARD iG51v
    Reviews found online7181
  3. 75

    Snow

    Level
    75
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticiceGUARD iG51v
    Reviews found online7978
  4. 68

    Comfort

    iceGUARD iG51v +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticiceGUARD iG51v
    Reviews found online6772
  5. 65

    Noise

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticiceGUARD iG51v
    Reviews found online6362
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Grabber Arctic +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticiceGUARD iG51v
    Reviews found online6959
  7. –

    Handling

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticiceGUARD iG51v
    Reviews found online–73
Scores at a glance
General Grabber Arctic vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber ArcticYokohama iceGUARD iG51v
Relative Score 69 71
Dry 64 72
Wet 71 78
Snow 75 75
Comfort 68 71
Noise 65 65
Treadwear 67 61
Handling – 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber Arctic

iceGUARD iG51v

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber Arctic

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and handling in snow and slush
  • Great value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
  • Reliable cold-weather performance on wet and icy surfaces

Cons

  • Moderate road noise when studded or on dry/slightly wet pavement
  • Average performance on hard-packed ice unless studded
  • Directional/rotational tread pattern may limit tire rotation options for some drivers
All owner themes in the Grabber Arctic review

Tire B iceGUARD iG51v

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber Arctic B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
CategoryWinterPremium Touring Winter tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available62
Rim diameters16″ – 20″18″
Tread depth12/32″13/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber Arctic

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v

Winner: Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v — better dry, wet and comfort. Pick the General Grabber Arctic if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v scores 72 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v scores 78 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber Arctic scores 67 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v scores 71 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · General Grabber Arctic
Tire B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

71

Narrow edge

iceGUARD iG51v

Amazon