Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber A/TX vs Nitto NT01 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 373 + 26 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber A/TX is ahead, 68–42
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Grabber A/TX +860Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX NT01 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 68 56 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68
NT01: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for NT01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
Grabber A/TX +4627Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX NT01 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 38 (est.) Reviews found online 74 10 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73
NT01: 60% × 37.6 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 27
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for NT01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
Grabber A/TX +3335Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX NT01 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 51 (est.) Reviews found online 67 10 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68
NT01: 60% × 51.3 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 35
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for NT01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
Grabber A/TX +2536Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX NT01 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 58 21 Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61
NT01: 40% × 59.1 (est.) + 60% × 20.9 = 36
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for NT01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Noise
Grabber A/TX +1945Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX NT01 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 13 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64
NT01: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 12.6 = 45
No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX or NT01. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Grabber A/TX +2545Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX NT01 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 54 (est.) Reviews found online 72 31 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70
NT01: 60% × 53.8 (est.) + 40% × 31.4 = 45
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for NT01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
59
Handling (owners)
Grabber A/TX +1346Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX NT01 Reviews found online 59 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber A/TX | Nitto NT01 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 42 |
| Dry | 68 | 60 |
| Wet | 73 | 27 |
| Snow | 68 | 35 |
| Comfort | 61 | 36 |
| Noise | 64 | 45 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 45 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Grabber A/TX
42
/ 100
NT01
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber A/TX
Pros
- Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
- Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
- Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
Tire B NT01
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and traction once warmed up
- Outstanding tread life and durability for a track tire (wears like iron)
- Consistent performance across multiple heat cycles with minimal degradation
Cons
- High risk of hydroplaning and poor performance in heavy rain or standing water
- Loud road noise and harsh ride quality when used for street driving
- Slow to warm up properly on the street, leading to faster wear off-track
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
General Grabber A/TX
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
r/f150
·14 upvotes ·2021-09-13
“Thoughts on the “General Grabber A/TX” Tire? I’m thinking about getting it in a 33” SL rated 275/70r18. This tire comes in at 46Lbs which is super light. $915ish for 4! It’s the only 33”, snow rated, All Terrain, C/SL load range I could find. All the other 33”s are E rated coming in around 60lbs.”
ram-trx.com
·3 upvotes ·2025-01-03
“We finally go out first snow storm of winter. We have 8” of fresh snow on the ground, and below that a half an inch of ice (it rained first then snowed). Initial impressions of the General Grabber A/Tx is good. Way quieter than stock tires on the highway, and good traction on snow and ice.”
5thgenrams.com
·2019-12-14
“Not sure where those ratings are from but all the ratings I have seen on the tire have been on par with other at tires. all 4 cost me 765 installed. My traction in NEPA has been excellent in the snow and wet.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI
Based on 37 community posts
Tire B
Nitto NT01
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/TX | B · Nitto NT01 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 44 | 17 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 14″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 14 - 17/32″ | 6.3/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A - B | 100 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
General Grabber A/TX
42
/ 100
Nitto NT01
Winner: General Grabber A/TX — better wet, snow and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber A/TX scores 73 vs 27 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 35 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber A/TX scores 61 vs 36 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber A/TX scores 70 vs 45 on treadwear.
Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · Nitto NT01
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber A/TX or NT01?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or NT01?
General Grabber A/TX, 73 vs 27 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or NT01?
General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Grabber A/TX or NT01?
General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 35 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Grabber A/TX or NT01?
General Grabber A/TX, 64 vs 45 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or NT01?
General Grabber A/TX, 61 vs 36 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or NT01?
General Grabber A/TX, 70 vs 45 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology