Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber A/TX vs Sumitomo Encounter AT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 370 + 26 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Grabber A/TX 70, Encounter AT 71.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 26 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Encounter AT +473Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Encounter AT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 69 75 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69
Encounter AT: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 73
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Encounter AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
74
Wet
Encounter AT +276Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Encounter AT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 75 77 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 74
Encounter AT: 60% × 74.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 76
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Encounter AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
Grabber A/TX +168Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Encounter AT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 67 66 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 69
Encounter AT: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 68
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Encounter AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
63
Comfort
Encounter AT +467Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Encounter AT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 59 66 Grabber A/TX: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59.4 = 63
Encounter AT: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.4 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX or Encounter AT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
Encounter AT +367Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Encounter AT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 60 68 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 64
Encounter AT: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 67
No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX or Encounter AT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Grabber A/TX +466Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Encounter AT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 72 66 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70
Encounter AT: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Encounter AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
58
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Encounter AT Reviews found online 58 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber A/TX | Sumitomo Encounter AT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 71 |
| Dry | 69 | 73 |
| Wet | 74 | 76 |
| Snow | 69 | 68 |
| Comfort | 63 | 67 |
| Noise | 64 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Grabber A/TX
71
/ 100
Encounter AT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber A/TX
Pros
- Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
- Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
- Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
Tire B Encounter AT
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
General Grabber A/TX
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
jeepforum.com
·2021-10-12
“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
f150forum.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
r/4Runner
·16 upvotes ·2020-10-11
“Swapped OEM 265/65R17 for Grabber A/Tx 265/70R17 On 2018 Wheels”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI
Based on 37 community posts
Tire B
Sumitomo Encounter AT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/TX | B · Sumitomo Encounter AT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 44 | 15 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 14 - 17/32″ | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A - B | 660 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 13 | 13 |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
General Grabber A/TX
71
/ 100
Sumitomo Encounter AT
Too close to call: General Grabber A/TX and Sumitomo Encounter AT are within 2 points overall. General Grabber A/TX is stronger on treadwear. Sumitomo Encounter AT is stronger on dry, comfort and noise.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber A/TX scores 70 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Sumitomo Encounter AT scores 73 vs 69 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Sumitomo Encounter AT scores 67 vs 63 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Sumitomo Encounter AT scores 67 vs 64 on noise.
Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · Sumitomo Encounter AT
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber A/TX or Encounter AT?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or Encounter AT?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 76 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or Encounter AT?
Sumitomo Encounter AT, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Grabber A/TX or Encounter AT?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Grabber A/TX or Encounter AT?
Sumitomo Encounter AT, 67 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or Encounter AT?
Sumitomo Encounter AT, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or Encounter AT?
General Grabber A/TX, 70 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology