Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 64 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber GT vs Sumitomo H/TR Z — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Grabber GT is ahead, 72–52
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
Grabber GT +1656Why this score
Source Grabber GT H/TR Z Reviews found online 75 50 -
74
Wet
Grabber GT +1757Why this score
Source Grabber GT H/TR Z Reviews found online 75 53 -
71
Comfort
Grabber GT +1457Why this score
Source Grabber GT H/TR Z Reviews found online 72 46 -
70
Treadwear
Grabber GT +2644Why this score
Source Grabber GT H/TR Z Reviews found online 73 29 -
72
Handling
Grabber GT +2349Why this score
Source Grabber GT H/TR Z Reviews found online 72 49
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber GT | Sumitomo H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 52 |
| Dry | 72 | 56 |
| Wet | 74 | 57 |
| Comfort | 71 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 44 |
| Handling | 72 | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Grabber GT
52
/ 100
H/TR Z
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber GT
Pros
- Exceptional tread wear and long lifespan
- Great value for price and budget-friendly
- Reliable traction in dry, wet, and light off-road conditions
Cons
- Vague or scary grip in the wet as the tires age
- Can become noisy over time
- Occasional reports of uneven wear or early punctures
Tire B H/TR Z
Pros
- High value-for-money proposition
- Strong dry weather traction
- Competitive tread life for some users
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear and longevity
- Subpar wet weather performance
- Reports of structural failure and blowouts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber GT | B · Sumitomo H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 49 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 23″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
General Grabber GT
52
/ 100
Sumitomo H/TR Z
Winner: General Grabber GT — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber GT scores 70 vs 44 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber GT scores 72 vs 49 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber GT scores 74 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber GT scores 72 vs 56 on dry.
Tire A · General Grabber GT
Tire B · Sumitomo H/TR Z
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.