General GRABBER SNOW looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

General GRABBER SNOW vs General Grabber X3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 3 + 119 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: GRABBER SNOW 67, Grabber X3 68.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General GRABBER SNOW
Tire AGeneral

GRABBER SNOW

Winter Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 3 reviews

General Grabber X3
Tire BGeneral

Grabber X3

Mud-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Grabber X3 +7
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGRABBER SNOWGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6171

    GRABBER SNOW: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 63

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    No road tests of dry for GRABBER SNOW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGRABBER SNOWGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7171

    GRABBER SNOW: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 71

    Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    No road tests of wet for GRABBER SNOW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 75

    Snow

    GRABBER SNOW +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGRABBER SNOWGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7970

    GRABBER SNOW: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 75

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    No road tests of snow for GRABBER SNOW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    GRABBER SNOW +6
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGRABBER SNOWGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7158

    GRABBER SNOW: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for GRABBER SNOW or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGRABBER SNOWGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–52

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    GRABBER SNOW +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGRABBER SNOWGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6665

    GRABBER SNOW: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 66

    Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for GRABBER SNOW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber X3 +2
    58
    Why this score
    SourceGRABBER SNOWGrabber X3
    Reviews found online5658
Scores at a glance
General GRABBER SNOW vs General Grabber X3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral GRABBER SNOWGeneral Grabber X3
Relative Score 67 68
Dry 63 70
Wet 71 71
Snow 75 70
Comfort 70 64
Noise – 61
Treadwear 66 65
Handling (owners) 56 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

GRABBER SNOW

Grabber X3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A GRABBER SNOW

Pros

  • Phenomenal traction in deep snow and muddy conditions
  • Impressive noise levels, often quieter than premium summer tires
  • Strong durability and tread life over multiple winter seasons

Cons

  • Soft compound construction may lead to faster wear if used in warmer temperatures
  • Limited performance in extreme deep mud compared to specialized off-road tires
All owner themes in the GRABBER SNOW review

Tire B Grabber X3

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
  • Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering

Cons

  • Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
  • Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
  • Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
All owner themes in the Grabber X3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General GRABBER SNOW B · General Grabber X3
CategoryWinter Touring tiresMud-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—6
Rim diameters—16″ – 18″
Tread depth—18 - 21/32″
UTQG—AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Serrated Raised Lettering
Max pressure—35 - 80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General GRABBER SNOW

General Grabber X3

Too close to call: General GRABBER SNOW and General Grabber X3 are within 2 points overall. General GRABBER SNOW is stronger on comfort and snow. General Grabber X3 is stronger on dry. General GRABBER SNOW rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber X3 scores 70 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

General GRABBER SNOW scores 70 vs 64 on comfort.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

General GRABBER SNOW scores 75 vs 70 on snow.

Tire A · General GRABBER SNOW
Tire B · General Grabber X3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

GRABBER SNOW or Grabber X3?

Which is better in the wet, GRABBER SNOW or Grabber X3?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, GRABBER SNOW or Grabber X3?

General Grabber X3, 70 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, GRABBER SNOW or Grabber X3?

General GRABBER SNOW, 75 vs 70 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, GRABBER SNOW or Grabber X3?

General GRABBER SNOW, 70 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, GRABBER SNOW or Grabber X3?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology