Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber X3 vs Kumho Road Venture AT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 119 + 154 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber X3 leads, 68–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber X3
Tire AGeneral

Grabber X3

Mud-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Grabber X3 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7167

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Grabber X3 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7169

    Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Grabber X3 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7068

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Road Venture AT51 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5862

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber X3 or Road Venture AT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    Road Venture AT51 +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5260

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Grabber X3 or Road Venture AT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Grabber X3 +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6557

    Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.2 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Road Venture AT51 +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Road Venture AT51
    Reviews found online5862
Scores at a glance
General Grabber X3 vs Kumho Road Venture AT51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber X3Kumho Road Venture AT51
Relative Score 68 66
Dry 70 67
Wet 71 69
Snow 70 69
Comfort 64 66
Noise 61 64
Treadwear 65 61
Handling (owners) 58 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber X3

Road Venture AT51

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber X3

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
  • Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering

Cons

  • Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
  • Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
  • Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
All owner themes in the Grabber X3 review

Tire B Road Venture AT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
  • Impressive traction and confidence in snow and winter conditions
  • Quiet and smooth highway ride with minimal road noise for an all-terrain tire

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some users under heavy or everyday use
  • Poor self-cleaning capabilities in deep or heavy mud
  • Reduced wet traction and potential slippage when the tread wears low
All owner themes in the Road Venture AT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber X3 B · Kumho Road Venture AT51
CategoryMud-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available610
Rim diameters16″ – 18″15″ – 18″
Tread depth18 - 21/32″13.5/32″
UTQGAA A540 A A
Treadwear warranty—55,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Raised LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure35 - 80 psi65 psi
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber X3

Kumho Road Venture AT51

Narrow edge: General Grabber X3 — better treadwear and dry. Pick the Kumho Road Venture AT51 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber X3 scores 65 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber X3 scores 70 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 64 vs 61 on noise.

Tire A · General Grabber X3
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture AT51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber X3 or Road Venture AT51?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber X3 or Road Venture AT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber X3 or Road Venture AT51?

General Grabber X3, 70 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber X3 or Road Venture AT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Grabber X3 or Road Venture AT51?

Kumho Road Venture AT51, 64 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber X3 or Road Venture AT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Grabber X3 or Road Venture AT51?

General Grabber X3, 65 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology