Tests 54 · 4 tests Owners 58 · 1 review
Head-to-head
Updated
Goodride ZuperSnow Z507 vs Star Performer Stratos UHP — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 3 road tests and 1 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Stratos UHP is ahead, 67–61
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 64 · 3 tests Owners 73 · 1 review
Best test result: #10 of 31 in 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test (wear)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Stratos UHP +670Why this score
Source ZuperSnow Z507 Stratos UHP Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 62 74 ZuperSnow Z507: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Stratos UHP: 60% × 67.2 + 40% × 74.1 = 70
No road tests of dry for ZuperSnow Z507. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
57
Wet
ZuperSnow Z507 +255Why this score
Source ZuperSnow Z507 Stratos UHP Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests 54 41 Reviews found online 63 78 Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 78% 75% ZuperSnow Z507: 60% × 53.8 + 40% × 62.6 = 57
Stratos UHP: 60% × 40.6 + 40% × 77.5 = 55
-
67
Snow
Stratos UHP +572Why this score
Source ZuperSnow Z507 Stratos UHP Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 64 73 ZuperSnow Z507: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67
Stratos UHP: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 73.2 = 72
No road tests of snow for ZuperSnow Z507. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
60
Comfort
Stratos UHP +1070Why this score
Source ZuperSnow Z507 Stratos UHP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 57 71 ZuperSnow Z507: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 56.5 = 60
Stratos UHP: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70
No road tests of comfort for ZuperSnow Z507. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Stratos UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison71Why this score
Source ZuperSnow Z507 Stratos UHP Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 75 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Stratos UHP: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of noise for Stratos UHP. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
53
Treadwear
Stratos UHP +1871Why this score
Source ZuperSnow Z507 Stratos UHP Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 45 68 ZuperSnow Z507: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 45.2 = 53
Stratos UHP: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 67.8 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for ZuperSnow Z507. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
59
Handling (owners)
Stratos UHP +1473Why this score
Source ZuperSnow Z507 Stratos UHP Reviews found online 59 73 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison78Why this score
Source ZuperSnow Z507 Stratos UHP Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 78
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodride ZuperSnow Z507 | Star Performer Stratos UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 67 |
| Dry | 64 | 70 |
| Wet | 57 | 55 |
| Snow | 67 | 72 |
| Comfort | 60 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 73 |
| Efficiency | – | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
ZuperSnow Z507
67
/ 100
Stratos UHP
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Goodride ZuperSnow Z507 finished ahead 2 times and Star Performer Stratos UHP 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | ZuperSnow Z507 | Stratos UHP | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | Wet | 78% | 75% | +2.2 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 50 Sets · 245/45 R19 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #35/50 | #40/50 | – | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 50 Sets · 245/45 R19 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZuperSnow Z507
Pros
- Satisfactory performance when the tread is new
- Budget-friendly price point
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short service life
- Poor durability under intensive driving conditions
- Susceptibility to punctures
Tire B Stratos UHP
Pros
- Excellent winter traction and performance
- Competitive quality compared to premium brands
- High user satisfaction and reliability
Cons
- Limited data available to assess long-term tread wear
- Lack of feedback regarding dry or wet summer performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodride ZuperSnow Z507 | B · Star Performer Stratos UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
Goodride ZuperSnow Z507
67
/ 100
Star Performer Stratos UHP
Winner: Star Performer Stratos UHP — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Where the Goodride ZuperSnow Z507 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Star Performer Stratos UHP scores 71 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Star Performer Stratos UHP scores 73 vs 59 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Star Performer Stratos UHP scores 70 vs 60 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Star Performer Stratos UHP scores 70 vs 64 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet braking
Goodride ZuperSnow Z507 won 2 of 2 shared wet braking tests.
Tire A · Goodride ZuperSnow Z507
Tire B · Star Performer Stratos UHP
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZuperSnow Z507 or Stratos UHP?
Which is better in the wet, ZuperSnow Z507 or Stratos UHP?
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 55 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZuperSnow Z507 or Stratos UHP?
Star Performer Stratos UHP, 70 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ZuperSnow Z507 or Stratos UHP?
Star Performer Stratos UHP, 72 vs 67 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ZuperSnow Z507 or Stratos UHP?
Star Performer Stratos UHP, 70 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZuperSnow Z507 or Stratos UHP?
Star Performer Stratos UHP, 71 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology