Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 16 reviews
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 16 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 79–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 83 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Defender LTX M/S +1979Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 55 84 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 60
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 84.3 = 79
No road tests of dry for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
65
Wet
Defender LTX M/S +1782Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 79 (est.) Reviews found online 62 86 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 65
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 78.8 (est.) + 40% × 85.6 = 82
No road tests of wet for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
60
Snow
Defender LTX M/S +1474Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 53 77 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 60
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 74
No road tests of snow for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
57
Comfort
Defender LTX M/S +1875Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 51 78 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.1 = 57
Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 77.7 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender LTX M/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 59 – Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 64
No road tests of noise for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Defender LTX M/S +1680Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 62 86 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 86.3 = 80
No road tests of treadwear for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
59
Handling (owners)
Defender LTX M/S +2382Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender LTX M/S Reviews found online 59 82
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 79 |
| Dry | 60 | 79 |
| Wet | 65 | 82 |
| Snow | 60 | 74 |
| Comfort | 57 | 75 |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 64 | 80 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Assurance CS Fuel Max
Defender LTX M/S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Assurance CS Fuel Max
Pros
- Exceptional tread life with many users reporting over 50,000 miles
- Improved fuel economy
- Consistent and reliable on-road handling
Cons
- Higher upfront cost compared to competing options
- Limited availability at some local retailers
- Primarily optimized for on-road use rather than off-road or severe weather conditions
Tire B Defender LTX M/S
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, often exceeding 60,000 miles
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride quality
- Strong traction and secure handling in wet, dry, and moderate snow conditions
Cons
- High initial purchase price compared to competitors
- Subpar off-road performance, specifically struggling in mud, sand, and loose gravel
- Limited ice performance compared to dedicated winter tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max | B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 A B | 720 - 800 B A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Vertical Serrated Band | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 59 on handling.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 60 on dry.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 75 vs 57 on comfort.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 65 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender LTX M/S?
Which is better in the wet, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 82 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 74 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 80 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology