Tests – · 1 test Owners 83 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Defender LTX M/S vs General Grabber HTS60 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 11 + 493 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S leads, 79–76 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 80 · 493 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I think there is a misconception that the cheaper tires are “unsafe”. What is more likely is they will be faster wearing and not necessarily have performance characteristics of a more expensive tires. There are 3-4 ranges for tires. ~$600, ~$1200, and $1800 for a set of 4 that will last between 20-50k miles. Then there is efficiency, say 1.7, 2.0, and 2.3 MPK. To get 2.3 MPK you need a tire under 40#. If we follow your hierarchy then you can limit the options to 3-4 tires: General grabber hts60 (best efficiency) Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 (long lasting) Pirelli AS+3 good all around but 115) I would consider one of the cheaper options but recognize it’s a gamble that may not pay off. Also, I would consider any tire under 50# not very suitable for off-road/towing usage, can you do it? Sure…but is it a good idea…nope.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
79
Dry
Defender LTX M/S +376Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 84 80 Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 84.3 = 79
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 80.3 = 76
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
82
Wet
Defender LTX M/S +478Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 79 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 86 81 Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 78.9 (est.) + 40% × 85.6 = 82
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 76.4 (est.) + 40% × 81.1 = 78
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
74
Snow
Defender LTX M/S +272Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 77 72 Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 74
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 72
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
75
Comfort
Grabber HTS60 +277Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 78 81 Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.6 = 75
Grabber HTS60: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 80.5 = 77
No road tests of comfort for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 83 Grabber HTS60: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 83.2 = 73
No road tests of noise for Grabber HTS60. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
80
Treadwear
Defender LTX M/S +377Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 75 74 Reviews found online 86 83 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 84% 79% Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 86.3 = 80
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 82.9 = 77
-
82
Handling (owners)
Defender LTX M/S +478Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Grabber HTS60 Reviews found online 82 78
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Defender LTX M/S | General Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 76 |
| Dry | 79 | 76 |
| Wet | 82 | 78 |
| Snow | 74 | 72 |
| Comfort | 75 | 77 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 77 |
| Handling (owners) | 82 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Defender LTX M/S
76
/ 100
Grabber HTS60
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Michelin Defender LTX M/S finished ahead 0 times and General Grabber HTS60 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Defender LTX M/S | Grabber HTS60 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 84% | 79% | +5.2 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/13 | #2/13 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Defender LTX M/S
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, often exceeding 60,000 miles
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride quality
- Strong traction and secure handling in wet, dry, and moderate snow conditions
Cons
- High initial purchase price compared to competitors
- Subpar off-road performance, specifically struggling in mud, sand, and loose gravel
- Limited ice performance compared to dedicated winter tires
Tire B Grabber HTS60
Pros
- Smooth and quiet highway ride quality
- Great value and affordable price point compared to premium brands
- Reliable all-season traction in wet, dry, and light winter conditions
Cons
- Occasional reports of minor road noise or hum at higher speeds
- Potential manufacturing inconsistencies, such as tires being out-of-round
- Aggressive tread pattern can occasionally cause slight slippage on loose dirt or debris when taking off
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
General Grabber HTS60
Community opinion of the General Grabber HTS 60 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its low price, quiet road manners, and strong fuel and electric efficiency compared to all-terrain alternatives. While widely praised as an affordable highway tire capable of light towing, some users note concerns regarding winter grip, wet hydroplaning at half tread, and isolated balance or sidewall defect issues.
r/f150
·32 upvotes ·2023-07-18
“New shoes today !! General Grabber HTS60 275/55/R20 117T Very good rated and $400 cheaper than the Michelins I wanted. Discount Tire price matched Sams Club since they were 2 weeks out.”
ford-trucks.com
“Just noticed on one of the pics I took of the tire that the factory added about 10lbs of lead to balance it. Seems like they could have done a better job of that... I see the colored dot on the tire and got wondering what that meant. Found this tidbit of info out there: Quote: Where Are the Paint Dots Placed? Quote: The yellow dots identify where a tire weighs the least — the lightest point on a tire. The yellow dot should be lined up and directly next to the valve stem, which is the wheel’s heaviest point. The red dots identify where the tire is flattest — the lowest point on a tire. The red dot should be directly across from the highest point of the wheel, which is usually indicated by a colored dot or a notch on the wheel. If a tire has a yellow and red dot, the red dot takes precedence when balancing the tire. Wonder if the factory people bother to do that correctly?”
f150lightningforum.com
·2024-04-19
“Hey guys, Turns out there's a puncture in one of my general grabbers and the shop is asking that I change all 4 at this point... When came the time to look at new tires, they advised me that these tires are simply Gerneral Grabber HTS60 tires...indicating that they aren't necessarily made different from any regular grabbers they would put on an ice truck. Can anybody confirm this? If so, has anybody tried a different all-season tire like the Michelin Defender LTX by any chance? Wondering if we'd be getting a huge hit in range... Thanks!”
Top themes
#fuel and EV efficiency#budget-friendly pricing#quiet and smooth ride#highway and road performance#light towing capability#winter and wet traction#treadwear and balance issues
Based on 38 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S | B · General Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 39 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10 - 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 720 - 800 B A | 620 - 680 A A - B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
76
/ 100
General Grabber HTS60
Narrow edge: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better wet, dry and treadwear. Where the General Grabber HTS60 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 78 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 80 vs 77 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Tire B · General Grabber HTS60
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Defender LTX M/S or Grabber HTS60?
Which is better in the wet, Defender LTX M/S or Grabber HTS60?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 82 vs 78 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Defender LTX M/S or Grabber HTS60?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 76 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Defender LTX M/S or Grabber HTS60?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Defender LTX M/S or Grabber HTS60?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 77 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Defender LTX M/S or Grabber HTS60?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 80 vs 77 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology