Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber A/TX vs General Grabber HTS60 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 370 + 492 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber HTS60 is ahead, 77–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber A/TX
Tire AGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

General Grabber HTS60
Tire BGeneral

Grabber HTS60

All Season

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 80 · 492 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Hey guys, Turns out there's a puncture in one of my general grabbers and the shop is asking that I change all 4 at this point... When came the time to look at new tires, they advised me that these tires are simply Gerneral Grabber HTS60 tires...indicating that they aren't necessarily made different from any regular grabbers they would put on an ice truck. Can anybody confirm this? If so, has anybody tried a different all-season tire like the Michelin Defender LTX by any chance? Wondering if we'd be getting a huge hit in range... Thanks!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Grabber HTS60 +8
    77
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online6981

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.5 (est.) + 40% × 81 = 77

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Grabber HTS60 +5
    79
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 77 (est.)
    Reviews found online7582

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 74

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 76.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.7 = 79

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Grabber HTS60 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6773

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 69

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 72

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Grabber HTS60 +14
    77
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5980

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 59.4 = 63

    Grabber HTS60: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS60. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    Grabber HTS60 +9
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6084

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.5 = 73

    No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS60. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Grabber HTS60 +7
    77
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)74
    Reviews found online7282

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 70

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 82.1 = 77

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber HTS60 +21
    79
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS60
    Reviews found online5879
Scores at a glance
General Grabber A/TX vs General Grabber HTS60: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber A/TXGeneral Grabber HTS60
Relative Score 69 77
Dry 69 77
Wet 74 79
Snow 69 72
Comfort 63 77
Noise 64 73
Treadwear 70 77
Handling (owners) 58 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber A/TX

± 7

Grabber HTS60

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

Tire B Grabber HTS60

Pros

  • Smooth and quiet highway ride quality
  • Great value and affordable price point compared to premium brands
  • Reliable all-season traction in wet, dry, and light winter conditions

Cons

  • Occasional reports of minor road noise or hum at higher speeds
  • Potential manufacturing inconsistencies, such as tires being out-of-round
  • Aggressive tread pattern can occasionally cause slight slippage on loose dirt or debris when taking off
All owner themes in the Grabber HTS60 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Tire B

General Grabber HTS60

Positive

Community opinion of the General Grabber HTS 60 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its low price, quiet road manners, and strong fuel and electric efficiency compared to all-terrain alternatives. While widely praised as an affordable highway tire capable of light towing, some users note concerns regarding winter grip, wet hydroplaning at half tread, and isolated balance or sidewall defect issues.

ford-trucks.com

“Just noticed on one of the pics I took of the tire that the factory added about 10lbs of lead to balance it. Seems like they could have done a better job of that... I see the colored dot on the tire and got wondering what that meant. Found this tidbit of info out there: Quote: Where Are the Paint Dots Placed? Quote: The yellow dots identify where a tire weighs the least — the lightest point on a tire. The yellow dot should be lined up and directly next to the valve stem, which is the wheel’s heaviest point. The red dots identify where the tire is flattest — the lowest point on a tire. The red dot should be directly across from the highest point of the wheel, which is usually indicated by a colored dot or a notch on the wheel. If a tire has a yellow and red dot, the red dot takes precedence when balancing the tire. Wonder if the factory people bother to do that correctly?”

rivianforums.com ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-07

“The General Grabber HTS60 is the best value tire currently available for efficiency. While its treadwear is not class-leading, the tire is backed by a mileage warranty, helping offset replacement costs and making its lifetime cost of ownership very attractive. More importantly, numerous Rivian owner reports indicate the HTS60 delivers efficiency that is comparable to, and in some cases exceeds, the OEM 21-inch road tire while significantly outperforming the OEM 20-inch all-terrain tire. When combined with its low purchase price, light weight, quiet ride, and strong on-road manners, the HTS60 stands out as one of the lowest-cost options for achieving near-maximum efficiency.”

r/f150 ·32 upvotes ·2023-07-18

“New shoes today !! General Grabber HTS60 275/55/R20 117T Very good rated and $400 cheaper than the Michelins I wanted. Discount Tire price matched Sams Club since they were 2 weeks out.”

Top themes
#fuel and EV efficiency#budget-friendly pricing#quiet and smooth ride#highway and road performance#light towing capability#winter and wet traction#treadwear and balance issues

Based on 38 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber A/TX B · General Grabber HTS60
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4439
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Tread depth14 - 17/32″10 - 14/32″
UTQG640 A A - B620 - 680 A A - B
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White LetteringBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure35 - 80 psi44 - 80 psi
Sizes in common1414

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber A/TX

General Grabber HTS60

Winner: General Grabber HTS60 — better handling, comfort and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber HTS60 scores 79 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber HTS60 scores 77 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

General Grabber HTS60 scores 73 vs 64 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber HTS60 scores 77 vs 69 on dry.

Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · General Grabber HTS60

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS60?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS60?

General Grabber HTS60, 79 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS60?

General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS60?

General Grabber HTS60, 72 vs 69 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS60?

General Grabber HTS60, 73 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS60?

General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS60?

General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 70 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology