Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 16 reviews
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max vs Michelin Defender T+H — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 16 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Defender T+H is ahead, 70–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Defender T+H +1070Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 56 71 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 60
Defender T+H: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 70
No road tests of dry for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
65
Wet
Defender T+H +873Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 63 73 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
Defender T+H: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 73
No road tests of wet for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
60
Snow
Defender T+H +565Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 53 62 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 60
Defender T+H: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 65
No road tests of snow for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
58
Comfort
Defender T+H +1068Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 52 67 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 52.1 = 58
Defender T+H: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 66.9 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender T+H. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 60 – Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 64
No road tests of noise for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Defender T+H +973Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 62 68 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64
Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 67.9 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
60
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Defender T+H Reviews found online 60 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max | Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 70 |
| Dry | 60 | 70 |
| Wet | 65 | 73 |
| Snow | 60 | 65 |
| Comfort | 58 | 68 |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 64 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Assurance CS Fuel Max
Defender T+H
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Assurance CS Fuel Max
Pros
- Exceptional tread life with many users reporting over 50,000 miles
- Improved fuel economy
- Consistent and reliable on-road handling
Cons
- Higher upfront cost compared to competing options
- Limited availability at some local retailers
- Primarily optimized for on-road use rather than off-road or severe weather conditions
Tire B Defender T+H
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max | B · Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Vertical Serrated Band | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max
Michelin Defender T+H
Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better dry, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 70 vs 60 on dry.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 68 vs 58 on comfort.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 64 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 65 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender T+H?
Which is better in the wet, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 70 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 68 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology