Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max vs Michelin Premier A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 55 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Assurance Fuel Max 62, Premier A/S 61.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Premier A/S
Tire BMichelin

Premier A/S

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Premier A/S +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxPremier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5962

    Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 62

    Premier A/S: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Premier A/S +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxPremier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6067

    Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63

    Premier A/S: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    Assurance Fuel Max +1
    59
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxPremier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5252

    Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 60

    Premier A/S: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    Premier A/S +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxPremier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5158

    Assurance Fuel Max: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.3 = 57

    Premier A/S: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Assurance Fuel Max or Premier A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxPremier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online61–

    Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Assurance Fuel Max +18
    47
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxPremier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online6434

    Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65

    Premier A/S: 60% × 54.9 (est.) + 40% × 34.3 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Premier A/S +4
    60
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxPremier A/S
    Reviews found online5660
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max vs Michelin Premier A/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Assurance Fuel MaxMichelin Premier A/S
Relative Score 62 61
Dry 62 64
Wet 63 68
Snow 60 59
Comfort 57 61
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 65 47
Handling (owners) 56 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Assurance Fuel Max

± 8

Premier A/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Assurance Fuel Max

Pros

  • Noticeable improvement in fuel economy / MPG
  • Reliable wet and dry traction and handling
  • Impressive long-term tread life and longevity

Cons

  • Some road noise on specific asphalt surfaces
  • Fuel savings may be less noticeable at higher highway speeds over 75 mph
  • Soft rubber compound can be vulnerable to sharp winter cinders or road debris
All owner themes in the Assurance Fuel Max review

Tire B Premier A/S

Pros

  • Comfortable ride quality with effective bump damping
  • Predictable and precise handling in dry conditions
  • Good center-line tracking and steering feedback

Cons

  • Disappointing tread life and premature wear
  • Poor traction and confidence in snow and ice
  • Susceptibility to hydroplaning at highway speeds
All owner themes in the Premier A/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max B · Michelin Premier A/S
CategoryAll Season Touring tiresAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7—
Rim diameters15″ – 18″—
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG580 - 620 A A - B640 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max

Michelin Premier A/S

Too close to call: Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max and Michelin Premier A/S are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max is stronger on treadwear. Michelin Premier A/S is stronger on wet and comfort. Michelin Premier A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 65 vs 47 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Premier A/S scores 68 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Premier A/S scores 61 vs 57 on comfort.

Tire A · Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max
Tire B · Michelin Premier A/S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Assurance Fuel Max or Premier A/S?

Which is better in the wet, Assurance Fuel Max or Premier A/S?

Michelin Premier A/S, 68 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Assurance Fuel Max or Premier A/S?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 64 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Assurance Fuel Max or Premier A/S?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 59 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Assurance Fuel Max or Premier A/S?

Michelin Premier A/S, 61 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Assurance Fuel Max or Premier A/S?

Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max, 65 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology