Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 18 reviews
Goodyear DuraGrip vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 18 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 72–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 63 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +771Why this score
Source DuraGrip BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 63 73 DuraGrip: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 64
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for DuraGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
66
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +975Why this score
Source DuraGrip BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 65 76 DuraGrip: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 75
No road tests of wet for DuraGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +1073Why this score
Source DuraGrip BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 61 76 DuraGrip: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.7 = 63
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.6 = 73
No road tests of comfort for DuraGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +367Why this score
Source DuraGrip BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 62 67 DuraGrip: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for DuraGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
60
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +1676Why this score
Source DuraGrip BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 60 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear DuraGrip | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 72 |
| Dry | 64 | 71 |
| Wet | 66 | 75 |
| Comfort | 63 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
DuraGrip
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DuraGrip
Pros
- Strong dry-weather traction and handling
- Surprisingly effective performance in light snow conditions
- High value-for-money proposition
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet grip as the tire ages
- Tendency for premature edge wear on certain vehicle geometries
- Hardening of rubber compound over time leading to reduced traction
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
- Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
- Strong value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
- Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear DuraGrip | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 15″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear DuraGrip
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear DuraGrip rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 76 vs 60 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 63 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 66 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 71 vs 64 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DuraGrip or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, DuraGrip or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, DuraGrip or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 71 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, DuraGrip or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, DuraGrip or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology