Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 13 reviews
Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate vs Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Eagle Exhilarate is ahead, 69–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 3 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Eagle Exhilarate +1455Why this score
Source Eagle Exhilarate Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 69 48 -
72
Wet
Eagle Exhilarate +1359Why this score
Source Eagle Exhilarate Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 72 55 -
61
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Eagle Exhilarate Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 55 – -
67
Comfort
Eagle Exhilarate +661Why this score
Source Eagle Exhilarate Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 65 53 -
68
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Eagle Exhilarate Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 70 – -
65
Treadwear
Eagle Exhilarate +956Why this score
Source Eagle Exhilarate Azenis FK453 Runflat Professional tests (TWG score) 63 – Reviews found online 67 49 -
69
Handling
Eagle Exhilarate +2049Why this score
Source Eagle Exhilarate Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 69 49
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate | Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 56 |
| Dry | 69 | 55 |
| Wet | 72 | 59 |
| Snow | 61 | – |
| Comfort | 67 | 61 |
| Noise | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 65 | 56 |
| Handling | 69 | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Eagle Exhilarate
Azenis FK453 Runflat
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle Exhilarate
Pros
- Strong dry pavement handling and sporty steering response
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Reliable wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance for many users
Cons
- Reports of significant road noise, described by some as intrusive
- Inconsistent tread life and potential for uneven wear
- Polarizing performance in snow and ice conditions
Tire B Azenis FK453 Runflat
Pros
- Competitive pricing compared to premium run-flat alternatives
- Strong dry handling and cornering performance
- Lower noise levels than some factory-fitted run-flat tires
Cons
- Highly inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Mediocre wet weather grip, particularly in lateral cornering
- Vague steering feedback reported by some drivers
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate | B · Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 37 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 500 AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Vertical Serrated Band | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat
Winner: Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate scores 69 vs 49 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate scores 69 vs 55 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate scores 72 vs 59 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate scores 65 vs 56 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.