Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 2,840 + 43 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is ahead, 71–58
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 2 tests Owners 68 · 2,840 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test (wet handling)
“i had some of those i think. they were ok. not great def got some wheel spin with them but i never felt unsafe. lasted a good prob 25-30k miles. i think mine were higher speed rating tho maybe 103 or something like that. for 100/tire not bad.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 43 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero Nero GT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 75 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 60 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 77.9 = 76
P Zero Nero GT: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 63
No road tests of dry for P Zero Nero GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero Nero GT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 81 | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 59 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 79.3 = 80
P Zero Nero GT: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
No road tests of wet for P Zero Nero GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero Nero GT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 57 (est.) | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 35 | 49 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.1 = 49
P Zero Nero GT: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 57
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for P Zero Nero GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero Nero GT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 79 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 48 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 40% × 78.8 + 60% × 72.7 = 75
P Zero Nero GT: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 48.2 = 55
No road tests of comfort for P Zero Nero GT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero Nero GT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 70 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 57 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 69.6 + 40% × 69.3 = 69
P Zero Nero GT: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 63
No road tests of noise for P Zero Nero GT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero Nero GT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 56 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 37 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
P Zero Nero GT: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 48
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for P Zero Nero GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero Nero GT |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 53 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero Nero GT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 70 | – |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Pirelli P Zero Nero GT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 58 |
| Dry | 76 | 63 |
| Wet | 80 | 62 |
| Snow | 49 | 57 |
| Comfort | 75 | 55 |
| Noise | 69 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 48 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 53 |
| Efficiency | 70 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
P Zero Nero GT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally regards the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 as a high-performing tire that offers great wet weather handling, a comfortable ride, and low noise levels compared to stiffer alternatives like Bridgestone and Continental. Drivers frequently note that these tires transform vehicle handling dynamics, offering a softer yet responsive ride that makes harsh suspensions more manageable. While some users on higher-powered cars experience occasional wheel spin, the overall consensus highlights them as a top-tier choice receiving strong reviews and competitive pricing.
“I've just replaced ContiSport 5's for Goodyear Assy 2 runflats and the Goodyears are so much quieter. Bought the tyres from Costco and paid £600 for 4 x tyres fitted 225 front & 255 rear on 19" rims. One thing I have noticed with the Goodyears is that the ride is much softer, so for the first time in 3 years of ownership when selecting Sport suspension [M sport adaptive suspension] the ride is fun. Previously the ride was too hard with Sport suspension selected. The Goodyears handle speed humps so much better than the Contis did.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by TodmordenLad That's a very good price. I paid £642 for 4 mixed 19 RFTs incl delivery from Camskill and then paid a BMW dealer £120 incl VAT to fit them - didn't want my local indie to mark the rims, which he did once before.. Yes, that price of £122 back in September was very good. There have been some well priced Goodyears F1's on Amazon recently, with keeping a watch fro your size.”
Based on 22 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | B · Pirelli P Zero Nero GT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 33 | 33 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 AA A | 280 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 8 | 8 |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Pirelli P Zero Nero GT
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Pirelli P Zero Nero GT if snow matters most to you.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 77 vs 53 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 75 vs 55 on comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 80 vs 62 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 64 vs 48 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 80 vs 62 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 76 vs 63 on our dry score.
Pirelli P Zero Nero GT, 57 vs 49 on our snow score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 69 vs 63 on our noise score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 75 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 64 vs 48 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
