Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 18 road tests and 2,843 + 3,619 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 83–75
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 2 tests Owners 68 · 2,843 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test (wet handling)
“i had some of those i think. they were ok. not great def got some wheel spin with them but i never felt unsafe. lasted a good prob 25-30k miles. i think mine were higher speed rating tho maybe 103 or something like that. for 100/tire not bad.”
Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 80 · 3,619 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 17 tests | 75 | 85 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 85 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 77.4 = 76
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.4 + 40% × 84.7 = 85
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 17 tests | 81 | 92 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 85 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 79.1 = 80
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.2 + 40% × 85.2 = 89
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 59 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 34 | – |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 34.3 = 49
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 8 tests | 78 | 91 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 74 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 40% × 77.7 + 60% × 72.1 = 74
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 90.6 + 60% × 74 = 81
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 13 tests | 70 | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 69.6 + 40% × 68.7 = 69
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests | ≈ 65 (est.) | 83 |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 71 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 70.9 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 84 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 14 tests | 70 | 61 |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 83 |
| Dry | 76 | 85 |
| Wet | 80 | 89 |
| Snow | 49 | – |
| Comfort | 74 | 81 |
| Noise | 69 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 84 |
| Efficiency | 70 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #6/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 98% #4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 100% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 80% #4/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 90% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% #4/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 98% #3/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 99% #7/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 89% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 80% #4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% #1/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 89% #4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #7/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 97% #6/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 95% #4/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 97% #3/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/8 2019 Auto Motor und Sport UHP Summer Tire Test R20 | #3/6 2021 Sportauto Summer Tire Test for Sportcars R19 | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally regards the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 as a high-performing tire that offers great wet weather handling, a comfortable ride, and low noise levels compared to stiffer alternatives like Bridgestone and Continental. Drivers frequently note that these tires transform vehicle handling dynamics, offering a softer yet responsive ride that makes harsh suspensions more manageable. While some users on higher-powered cars experience occasional wheel spin, the overall consensus highlights them as a top-tier choice receiving strong reviews and competitive pricing.
“i had some of those i think. they were ok. not great def got some wheel spin with them but i never felt unsafe. lasted a good prob 25-30k miles. i think mine were higher speed rating tho maybe 103 or something like that. for 100/tire not bad.”
“I've just replaced ContiSport 5's for Goodyear Assy 2 runflats and the Goodyears are so much quieter. Bought the tyres from Costco and paid £600 for 4 x tyres fitted 225 front & 255 rear on 19" rims. One thing I have noticed with the Goodyears is that the ride is much softer, so for the first time in 3 years of ownership when selecting Sport suspension [M sport adaptive suspension] the ride is fun. Previously the ride was too hard with Sport suspension selected. The Goodyears handle speed humps so much better than the Contis did.”
Based on 22 community posts
Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
“I have them fitted in both my cars (Audi A6 and CLK350). Neither had the performance of your AMG but I can confirm they are the best tyres I’ve ever had in terms of grip and feel.”
Based on 13 community posts
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 33 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 AA A | 300 - 500 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 12 | 12 |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better treadwear, dry and wet. Pick the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 if efficiency matters most to you.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 78 vs 64 on treadwear.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 70 vs 61 on efficiency.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 85 vs 76 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 89 vs 80 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 89 vs 80 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 85 vs 76 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 81 vs 74 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 78 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 70 vs 61 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
