Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 31 road tests and 2,840 + 907 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 and Azenis FK510 are level at 71.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 2 tests Owners 68 · 2,840 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test (wet handling)
“i had some of those i think. they were ok. not great def got some wheel spin with them but i never felt unsafe. lasted a good prob 25-30k miles. i think mine were higher speed rating tho maybe 103 or something like that. for 100/tire not bad.”
Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 907 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 28 tests | 75 | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 75 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 95% | 93% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 99% | 99% |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 80% | 70% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 77.9 = 76
Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 74
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 29 tests | 81 | 89 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 78 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 94% | 95% |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 89% | 67% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 90% | 94% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 97% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 79.3 = 80
Azenis FK510: 60% × 89 + 40% × 78.3 = 85
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 57 (est.) | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 35 | 46 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.1 = 49
Azenis FK510: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 6 tests | 79 | 42 |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 68 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 60% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 40% × 78.8 + 60% × 72.7 = 75
Azenis FK510: 40% × 41.7 + 60% × 67.6 = 57
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 18 tests | 70 | 66 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 67 |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 98% | 98% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 69.6 + 40% × 69.3 = 69
Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.3 = 67
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests | ≈ 65 (est.) | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 54 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 72 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 19 tests | 70 | 51 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 95% | 96% |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 71 |
| Dry | 76 | 74 |
| Wet | 80 | 85 |
| Snow | 49 | 55 |
| Comfort | 75 | 57 |
| Noise | 69 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 70 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Azenis FK510
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 finished ahead 2 times and Falken Azenis FK510 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% | 93% | +2.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 99% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 80% | 70% | +10.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% | 95% | −1.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% | 94% | −4.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% | 97% | +3.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 89% | 67% | +22.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% | 60% | +40.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Noise | Noise | 98% | 98% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 95% | 96% | −1.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/8 | #7/8 | – | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 Auto Motor und Sport UHP Summer Tire Test R20 · 245/30R20 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment for the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is predominantly positive, with drivers praising its wet-weather handling, quiet road noise, and comfortable ride quality compared to competitors and run-flat alternatives. While traction and longevity are generally viewed favorably, a few owners noted moderate grip limitations under hard acceleration or confusion regarding all-season versus summer classifications.
“I've just replaced ContiSport 5's for Goodyear Assy 2 runflats and the Goodyears are so much quieter. Bought the tyres from Costco and paid £600 for 4 x tyres fitted 225 front & 255 rear on 19" rims. One thing I have noticed with the Goodyears is that the ride is much softer, so for the first time in 3 years of ownership when selecting Sport suspension [M sport adaptive suspension] the ride is fun. Previously the ride was too hard with Sport suspension selected. The Goodyears handle speed humps so much better than the Contis did.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by TodmordenLad That's a very good price. I paid £642 for 4 mixed 19 RFTs incl delivery from Camskill and then paid a BMW dealer £120 incl VAT to fit them - didn't want my local indie to mark the rims, which he did once before.. Yes, that price of £122 back in September was very good. There have been some well priced Goodyears F1's on Amazon recently, with keeping a watch fro your size.”
Based on 21 community posts
Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.
“I think Vredestein was more popular in Europe but Tire Rack has been expanding their presence in the US. Some of their tires are kinda unique bridging capabilities of different tire categories. There's another model they have called the Quatrac 5 which is an all-season sportier touring tire that has the severe snow duty rating like winter tires, but can be driven year round unlike winter tires. So they were on my radar because of that. (I'm "that car guy" who most of my friends and family consult when buying car stuff like tires so I find myself researching too many categories of tires. ?) This Hypertrac AS is a newer model and more focused on performance, but it seems to be a UHPAS option with more comfort than similar tires. If you're experiencing that lack of performance from the OE Goodyears you should look at those Falken FK510s. They're a summer tire but the sidewalls are pretty soft. They're supposed to be comfier than usual for a summer tire. You'll get more grip than the stock tires. They might not be much quieter or smoother riding but probably won't be any worse.”
“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”
Based on 63 community posts
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 33 | 93 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 AA A | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 26 | 26 |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Falken Azenis FK510
Too close to call: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 and Falken Azenis FK510 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is stronger on efficiency and comfort. Falken Azenis FK510 is stronger on snow and wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 70 vs 51 on efficiency.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 75 vs 57 on comfort.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 55 vs 49 on snow.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 85 vs 80 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Falken Azenis FK510, 85 vs 80 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Falken Azenis FK510, 55 vs 49 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 75 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 70 vs 51 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
