Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 31 road tests and 2,843 + 912 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 71, Azenis FK510 70.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 2 tests Owners 68 · 2,843 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test (wet handling)
“i had some of those i think. they were ok. not great def got some wheel spin with them but i never felt unsafe. lasted a good prob 25-30k miles. i think mine were higher speed rating tho maybe 103 or something like that. for 100/tire not bad.”
Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 912 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 28 tests | 75 | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 74 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 95% | 93% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 99% | 99% |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 80% | 70% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 77.4 = 76
Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 74.2 = 73
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 29 tests | 81 | 88 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 78 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 94% | 95% |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 89% | 67% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 90% | 94% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 97% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 79.1 = 80
Azenis FK510: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 78 = 84
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 59 (est.) | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 34 | 45 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 34.3 = 49
Azenis FK510: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.9 = 55
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 6 tests | 78 | 40 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 67 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 60% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 40% × 77.7 + 60% × 72.1 = 74
Azenis FK510: 40% × 40.1 + 60% × 66.9 = 56
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 18 tests | 70 | 66 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 67 |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 98% | 98% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 69.6 + 40% × 68.7 = 69
Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 = 66
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests | ≈ 65 (est.) | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 54 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 72 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 19 tests | 70 | 50 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 95% | 96% |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 70 |
| Dry | 76 | 73 |
| Wet | 80 | 84 |
| Snow | 49 | 55 |
| Comfort | 74 | 56 |
| Noise | 69 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 70 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Azenis FK510
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 finished ahead 2 times and Falken Azenis FK510 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% | 93% | +2.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 99% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 80% | 70% | +10.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% | 95% | −1.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% | 94% | −4.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% | 97% | +3.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 89% | 67% | +22.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% | 60% | +40.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Noise | Noise | 98% | 98% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 95% | 96% | −1.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test · 245/30 R20 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/8 | #7/8 | – | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 Auto Motor und Sport UHP Summer Tire Test R20 · 245/30R20 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally regards the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 as a high-performing tire that offers great wet weather handling, a comfortable ride, and low noise levels compared to stiffer alternatives like Bridgestone and Continental. Drivers frequently note that these tires transform vehicle handling dynamics, offering a softer yet responsive ride that makes harsh suspensions more manageable. While some users on higher-powered cars experience occasional wheel spin, the overall consensus highlights them as a top-tier choice receiving strong reviews and competitive pricing.
“i had some of those i think. they were ok. not great def got some wheel spin with them but i never felt unsafe. lasted a good prob 25-30k miles. i think mine were higher speed rating tho maybe 103 or something like that. for 100/tire not bad.”
“I've just replaced ContiSport 5's for Goodyear Assy 2 runflats and the Goodyears are so much quieter. Bought the tyres from Costco and paid £600 for 4 x tyres fitted 225 front & 255 rear on 19" rims. One thing I have noticed with the Goodyears is that the ride is much softer, so for the first time in 3 years of ownership when selecting Sport suspension [M sport adaptive suspension] the ride is fun. Previously the ride was too hard with Sport suspension selected. The Goodyears handle speed humps so much better than the Contis did.”
Based on 22 community posts
Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.
“I've had a set of Falken Azenis FK510's on my car for a couple of months now, and just this past weekend took a trip through the twisties up to Prescott, and pushed the car as hard as I could heading up the mountain. I was a little nervous as I'd never used Falken tires before, but trusted in Tire Rack's reviews of them and pushed the envelope in every turn I hit. It was a pleasant surprise to find that the tires were gripping just as well as the much more expensive Michelin tires they'd replaced, and I even hit a personal best of .95g going around one of the more nasty turns. During this entire drive I never felt once like the tires weren't gripping perfectly, or that I was going to lose control from them breaking loose. Road noise is pretty much non-existent, and they seem to run pretty smooth over every surface I've driven them on so far. All-in-all I don't regret my purchase one bit, and if their longevity is anything like what I got out of my previous set of Michelins I'll definitely be buying another set once this one is done for.”
“Falken Azenis FK510 prices? Anyone know why the prices for Falken Azenis FK510's went up 25% or more in the last month? 235/40R18 went from $154 to $192. The whole benefit of these tires is that they offer PS4S performance for way less money. Now, you midaswhale just buy the Michelins. I haven't seen any other summer tires make that kind of a jump in price. I know Falken announced a price increase for 2022, but it was only like 5%. What's the dealio? Read more”
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
Based on 63 community posts
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 33 | 93 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 AA A | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 26 | 26 |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Falken Azenis FK510
Too close to call: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 and Falken Azenis FK510 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is stronger on efficiency, comfort and dry. Falken Azenis FK510 is stronger on snow and wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 70 vs 50 on efficiency.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 74 vs 56 on comfort.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 55 vs 49 on snow.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 84 vs 80 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Falken Azenis FK510, 84 vs 80 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 76 vs 73 on our dry score.
Falken Azenis FK510, 55 vs 49 on our snow score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 69 vs 66 on our noise score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 74 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 70 vs 50 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
