Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 17 reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Sport is ahead, 76–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
Eagle F1 Sport +671Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Sport Advan A050 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 82 73 Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 77
Advan A050: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 71
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
79
Wet
Eagle F1 Sport +1960Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Sport Advan A050 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 77 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 83 55 Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 77.2 (est.) + 40% × 82.6 = 79
Advan A050: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Comfort
Eagle F1 Sport +1161Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Sport Advan A050 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 74 57 Eagle F1 Sport: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.9 = 72
Advan A050: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 57.1 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Sport +2147Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Sport Advan A050 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 69 35 Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 68
Advan A050: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 35.2 = 47
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
84
Handling (owners)
Eagle F1 Sport +1371Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Sport Advan A050 Reviews found online 84 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport | Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 62 |
| Dry | 77 | 71 |
| Wet | 79 | 60 |
| Comfort | 72 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 47 |
| Handling (owners) | 84 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Eagle F1 Sport
Advan A050
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 Sport
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with high cornering confidence
- High level of comfort and plush ride quality for a sporty tire
- Sharp steering response and improved handling
Cons
- Potential for aquaplaning in heavy downpours
- Some reports of rapid outer tread wear or durability issues under harsh driving
- Softer sidewalls can sometimes reduce direct steering feedback
Tire B Advan A050
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
- Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
- Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life
Cons
- Very high price point compared to competitors
- Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
- Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport | B · Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport
Yokohama Advan A050
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Advan A050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 68 vs 47 on treadwear.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 79 vs 60 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 84 vs 71 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 72 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eagle F1 Sport or Advan A050?
Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Sport or Advan A050?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, 79 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Sport or Advan A050?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, 77 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Sport or Advan A050?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, 72 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Sport or Advan A050?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, 68 vs 47 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology