Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 6 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Yokohama Advan A050 vs Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 6 + 452 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza RE 71RS is ahead, 75–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 452 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (wet handling (tester's mark))
“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Potenza RE 71RS +1182Why this score
Source Advan A050 Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 73 92 Advan A050: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 76 + 40% × 92.1 = 82
No road tests of dry for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
60
Wet
Potenza RE 71RS +1878Why this score
Source Advan A050 Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 56 67 Advan A050: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 85 + 40% × 66.7 = 78
No road tests of wet for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Comfort
Advan A050 +160Why this score
Source Advan A050 Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 58 52 Advan A050: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 57.7 = 61
Potenza RE 71RS: 40% × 71.1 + 60% × 52 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Advan A050. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source Advan A050 Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 67 Reviews found online – 63 Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 63.3 = 65
-
47
Treadwear
Potenza RE 71RS +1057Why this score
Source Advan A050 Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 55 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 35 51 Advan A050: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 35 = 47
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE 71RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
72
Handling (owners)
Potenza RE 71RS +1486Why this score
Source Advan A050 Potenza RE 71RS Reviews found online 72 86
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan A050 | Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 75 |
| Dry | 71 | 82 |
| Wet | 60 | 78 |
| Comfort | 61 | 60 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 47 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Advan A050
75
/ 100
Potenza RE 71RS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advan A050
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
- Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
- Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life
Cons
- Very high price point compared to competitors
- Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
- Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
Tire B Potenza RE 71RS
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and rapid warm-up characteristics.
- Highly predictable and communicative at the limit, allowing for easy recovery.
- Improved on-road refinement, noise levels, and comfort compared to its predecessor.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, especially when used aggressively on track or heavy vehicles.
- Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose peak grip during extended track sessions.
- Stiff sidewalls can make mounting the tires onto rims difficult.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Yokohama Advan A050
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Community sentiment toward the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high grip levels, responsive turn-in, and improved refinement over the older RE-71R. Discussions frequently center around track and autocross setups, optimal hot tire pressures, clearance pricing, and its streetability regarding road noise and gravel pickup. Minor caveats noted include fast wear characteristic of 200tw competition tires and rotation limits stemming from an asymmetrical tread design.
civicx.com
·2025-02-25
“They are an amazing tire, both for autocross and track days. I'm currently running Falkens but my next track set will be RE71s for sure. Should be able to get a half second off my laps from what I've seen so far.”
s2ki.com
“When I said 'they are more different than I expected,' the best way to describe that with one word is SMOOTH! These tires are smooth in all aspects. They are substantially quieter than the old 71R, maybe a 2 out of 10. After driving on two lane blacktops, I have not noticed any measurable gravel or other debris picked up at this point, definitely less than the 71R, maybe 50% reduction. Handling is the most important aspect for me personally and Bridgestone has hit a home run! Stopping fantastic and according to Bridgestone they are better on wet roads, IDK as I try to avoid driving in the rain. Steering is amazing and more sensitive! There is even a level of comfort that I did not expect for performance tires. Honestly, I am unable to come up with any negative. Five Stars! The post by jst2878 was spot on about them being a 'gift!' After break in greater than 300 miles, they just need to be hammered! After doing so yesterday, I have returned home for Pina Coladas & Pool this weekend!”
r/ElantraN
·5 upvotes ·2025-09-06
“Track tire fitment Just got some new Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs in 245/40r18. I did my research on this subreddit and it seems like that will fit without rubbing/camber bolts. Does anyone know if the RE-71rs’ run wide cause they measure a full inch wider than the stock PS4s’, I’m just wondering now if I’ll need camber bolts. I’d prefer not, just want to throw them on and go. For reference they are being mounted onto a 18x8.5 +45 Enkei TS-V wheel. If anyone could offer insight cause I just can’t understand how they would fit but maybe I’m just over thinking it. Stock suspension by the way. I searched the sub and didn’t see anything with exact matching specs, only bigger and different tires. Tl;dr Will 245/40r18 Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs’ fit on an 18x8.5 +45 wheel without clearance issues/adding other modifications (camber bolts) on our car? Thanks for any help! Read more”
Top themes
#track and autocross performance#tire pressure tuning#road noise and refinement#clearance pricing and availability#fitment and sizing#tread wear and longevity#comparison to previous RE-71R
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan A050 | B · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 10 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Yokohama Advan A050
75
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — better wet, handling and dry. Where the Yokohama Advan A050 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Yokohama Advan A050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 78 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 86 vs 72 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 82 vs 71 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 57 vs 47 on treadwear.
Tire A · Yokohama Advan A050
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advan A050 or Potenza RE 71RS?
Which is better in the wet, Advan A050 or Potenza RE 71RS?
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 78 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advan A050 or Potenza RE 71RS?
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 82 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Advan A050 or Potenza RE 71RS?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Advan A050 or Potenza RE 71RS?
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 57 vs 47 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology