Tests 62 · 2 tests Owners 63 · 4 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 6 in The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 (dry braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 4 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads, 64–62 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 2 tests Owners 63 · 4 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 6 in The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 (dry braking)
Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 6 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 79 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 73 |
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 73.9 = 77
Advan A050: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71
No road tests of dry for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 45 | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 56 |
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 45 + 40% × 63.3 = 52
Advan A050: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60
No road tests of wet for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 58 |
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 40% × 69.6 (est.) + 60% × 71.7 = 71
Advan A050: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 57.7 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or Advan A050. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 59 (est.) | ≈ 55 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 45 | 35 |
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 53
Advan A050: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 35 = 47
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 73 | 72 |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 62 |
| Dry | 77 | 71 |
| Wet | 52 | 60 |
| Comfort | 71 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 47 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Advan A050
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | B · Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 7 | — |
| Rim diameters | 20″ – 21″ | — |
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Yokohama Advan A050
Narrow edge: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — better comfort, dry and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if wet matters most to you. Yokohama Advan A050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 71 vs 61 on comfort.
Yokohama Advan A050 scores 60 vs 52 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 77 vs 71 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 53 vs 47 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Yokohama Advan A050, 60 vs 52 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 77 vs 71 on our dry score.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 71 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 53 vs 47 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology