Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 4 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads, 64–62 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
± 6

Tests 62 · 2 tests Owners 63 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 6 in The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 (dry braking)

Yokohama Advan A050
Tire BYokohama

Advan A050

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RAdvan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests79≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7473

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 73.9 = 77

    Advan A050: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 52

    Wet

    Advan A050 +8
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RAdvan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests45≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6356

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 45 + 40% × 63.3 = 52

    Advan A050: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60

    No road tests of wet for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +10
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RAdvan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7258

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 40% × 69.6 (est.) + 60% × 71.7 = 71

    Advan A050: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 57.7 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or Advan A050. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 53

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +6
    47
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RAdvan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online4535

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 53

    Advan A050: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 35 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  5. 73

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RAdvan A050
    Reviews found online7372
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Yokohama Advan A050: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 RYokohama Advan A050
Relative Score 64 62
Dry 77 71
Wet 52 60
Comfort 71 61
Treadwear 53 47
Handling (owners) 73 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

± 8

Advan A050

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip providing a planted and confident feel on the track
  • Optimized design specifically for extracting maximum performance during time attacks
  • Superior circuit performance compared to the standard Pilot Sport Cup 2

Cons

  • Extremely limited performance longevity, with grip dropping off rapidly after just a few laps
  • Poor performance and safety risks in damp to wet conditions due to shallow and narrow tread patterns
  • Best suited strictly for single-lap time trials rather than extended track sessions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport Cup 2 R review

Tire B Advan A050

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
  • Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life

Cons

  • Very high price point compared to competitors
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
  • Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
All owner themes in the Advan A050 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R B · Yokohama Advan A050
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7—
Rim diameters20″ – 21″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Yokohama Advan A050

Narrow edge: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — better comfort, dry and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if wet matters most to you. Yokohama Advan A050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 71 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan A050 scores 60 vs 52 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 77 vs 71 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 53 vs 47 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A050

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or Advan A050?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or Advan A050?

Yokohama Advan A050, 60 vs 52 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or Advan A050?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 77 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or Advan A050?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 71 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or Advan A050?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 53 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology