Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 17 reviews
Yokohama Advan S4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport vs Yokohama Advan S4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Sport is ahead, 73–51
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Eagle F1 Sport +2252Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Sport Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 77 43 Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74
Advan S4: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 42.6 = 52
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
75
Wet
Eagle F1 Sport +3144Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Sport Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 50 (est.) Reviews found online 77 35 Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 75
Advan S4: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 44
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Comfort
Eagle F1 Sport +1654Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Sport Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 72 40 Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 70
Advan S4: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 40 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Sport or Advan S4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Sport +264Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Sport Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 66 62 Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66
Advan S4: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
77
Handling (owners)
Eagle F1 Sport +3047Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Sport Advan S4 Reviews found online 77 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport | Yokohama Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 51 |
| Dry | 74 | 52 |
| Wet | 75 | 44 |
| Comfort | 70 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Eagle F1 Sport
Advan S4
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 Sport
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with high cornering confidence
- High level of comfort and plush ride quality for a sporty tire
- Sharp steering response and improved handling
Cons
- Potential for aquaplaning in heavy downpours
- Some reports of rapid outer tread wear or durability issues under harsh driving
- Softer sidewalls can sometimes reduce direct steering feedback
Tire B Advan S4
Pros
- Acceptable handling characteristics at very low city speeds
- Responsiveness can be marginally improved by adjusting tire pressure
Cons
- Poor traction and grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Significant lack of performance in snow and winter environments
- Noticeable understeer and sluggish turn-in response
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport | B · Yokohama Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport
Yokohama Advan S4
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Advan S4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 75 vs 44 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 77 vs 47 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 74 vs 52 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 70 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eagle F1 Sport or Advan S4?
Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Sport or Advan S4?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, 75 vs 44 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Sport or Advan S4?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, 74 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Sport or Advan S4?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, 70 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Sport or Advan S4?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology