Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 3 reviews
Yokohama Advan S4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama Advan S4 vs Michelin Primacy 4+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 10 road tests and 3 + 39 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy 4+ is ahead, 78–51
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 83 · 10 tests Owners 72 · 39 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
Primacy 4+ +2678Why this score
Source Advan S4 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 43 72 Advan S4: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 42.6 = 52
Primacy 4+: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 71.8 = 78
No road tests of dry for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
44
Wet
Primacy 4+ +3579Why this score
Source Advan S4 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 50 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 35 75 Advan S4: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 44
Primacy 4+: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 75.4 = 79
No road tests of wet for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
54
Comfort
Primacy 4+ +1973Why this score
Source Advan S4 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 40 72 Advan S4: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 40 = 54
Primacy 4+: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Advan S4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source Advan S4 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests – 77 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Primacy 4+: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
64
Treadwear
Primacy 4+ +1882Why this score
Source Advan S4 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 90 Reviews found online 62 70 Advan S4: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
Primacy 4+: 60% × 89.8 + 40% × 70.3 = 82
No road tests of treadwear for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
47
Handling (owners)
Primacy 4+ +2168Why this score
Source Advan S4 Primacy 4+ Reviews found online 47 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan S4 | Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 78 |
| Dry | 52 | 78 |
| Wet | 44 | 79 |
| Comfort | 54 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 82 |
| Handling (owners) | 47 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Advan S4
Primacy 4+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advan S4
Pros
- Acceptable handling characteristics at very low city speeds
- Responsiveness can be marginally improved by adjusting tire pressure
Cons
- Poor traction and grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Significant lack of performance in snow and winter environments
- Noticeable understeer and sluggish turn-in response
Tire B Primacy 4+
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and a smooth, compliant 'limousine-like' feel over bumps
- Strong and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions, inspiring confidence
- Noticeable improvement in quietness and traction compared to predecessor tires or factory options
Cons
- Loud road noise and a harsh drone on rough or coarse asphalt surfaces
- Soft sidewalls can reduce steering agility and initial responsiveness compared to dedicated sport tires
- High premium price point relative to competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan S4 | B · Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Advan S4
Michelin Primacy 4+
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4+ — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan S4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 79 vs 44 on wet.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 78 vs 52 on dry.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 68 vs 47 on handling.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 73 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advan S4 or Primacy 4+?
Which is better in the wet, Advan S4 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 79 vs 44 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advan S4 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 78 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Advan S4 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 73 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Advan S4 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 82 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology