Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 40 reviews
Yokohama Advan S4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS vs Yokohama Advan S4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 40 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN Neova AD08RS is ahead, 61–51
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
ADVAN Neova AD08RS +752Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 54 43 ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 59
Advan S4: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 42.6 = 52
No road tests of dry for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
62
Wet
ADVAN Neova AD08RS +1844Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 50 (est.) Reviews found online 59 35 ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
Advan S4: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 44
No road tests of wet for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
62
Comfort
ADVAN Neova AD08RS +854Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 55 40 ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 62
Advan S4: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 40 = 54
No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Advan S4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
ADVAN Neova AD08RS +164Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 65 62 ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 65
Advan S4: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
60
Handling (owners)
ADVAN Neova AD08RS +1347Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Advan S4 Reviews found online 60 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS | Yokohama Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 51 |
| Dry | 59 | 52 |
| Wet | 62 | 44 |
| Comfort | 62 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Advan S4
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Pros
- Exceptional treadwear longevity and durability
- Stiff, robust sidewalls providing precise turn-in response
- Good wet performance and hydroplaning resistance for a sporty tire
Cons
- Noticeably lower dry grip and higher limits compared to the older AD08R
- Prone to loud squealing early before reaching true limits
- Harder compound can feel unpredictable or slippery when cold or in wet conditions
Tire B Advan S4
Pros
- Acceptable handling characteristics at very low city speeds
- Responsiveness can be marginally improved by adjusting tire pressure
Cons
- Poor traction and grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Significant lack of performance in snow and winter environments
- Noticeable understeer and sluggish turn-in response
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS | B · Yokohama Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 35 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Yokohama Advan S4
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan S4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 62 vs 44 on wet.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 60 vs 47 on handling.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 62 vs 54 on comfort.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 59 vs 52 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Advan S4?
Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Advan S4?
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS, 62 vs 44 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Advan S4?
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS, 59 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Advan S4?
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS, 62 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Advan S4?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology