Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 9 road tests and 1 + 1,371 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
± 5

Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,371 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)

“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    86
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2 RunOnFlatPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests–86
    Reviews found online–86

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86 + 40% × 86.4 = 86

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    91
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2 RunOnFlatPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests–94
    Reviews found online–87

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 94 + 40% × 86.7 = 91

  3. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2 RunOnFlatPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–54
    Reviews found online–71

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54.2 + 60% × 71.2 = 64

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2 RunOnFlatPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests–53
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 58

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2 RunOnFlatPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–77
    Reviews found online–65

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 65.3 = 72

  6. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    83
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2 RunOnFlatPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Reviews found online–83
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2 RunOnFlatPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests–64
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlatMichelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Relative Score – 81
Dry – 86
Wet – 91
Comfort – 64
Noise – 58
Treadwear – 72
Handling (owners) – 83
Efficiency – 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat

± 5

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
  • Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling

Cons

  • Higher-than-average purchase price
  • Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
  • Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is generally very positive, with owners highlighting its strong grip, handling precision, and suitability for heavy performance SUVs. Users frequently compare it favorably to older Latitude Sport 3 and standard passenger tires, though they emphasize its summer-only limitation below 40°F and note trade-offs in price and tread life.

Top themes
#Summer temperature limitations#Grip and handling performance#Tread life and wear#Comparison with Latitude Sport 3#Ride comfort and firmness#SUV-specific load design

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—65
Rim diameters—17″ – 23″

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Only Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology