Goodyear Eagle UltraGrip looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle UltraGrip vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle UltraGrip leads, 72–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
Tire BYokohama

iceGUARD iG51v

Premium Touring Winter tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEagle UltraGripiceGUARD iG51v
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7372

    Eagle UltraGrip: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 71

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Eagle UltraGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 76

    Wet

    iceGUARD iG51v +2
    78
    Why this score
    SourceEagle UltraGripiceGUARD iG51v
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online7880

    Eagle UltraGrip: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 76

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 78

    No road tests of wet for Eagle UltraGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEagle UltraGripiceGUARD iG51v
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online–76

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 74

    No road tests of snow for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    iceGUARD iG51v +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEagle UltraGripiceGUARD iG51v
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6770

    Eagle UltraGrip: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.4 = 68

    iceGUARD iG51v: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.7 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle UltraGrip or iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEagle UltraGripiceGUARD iG51v
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–58

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 63

    No road tests of noise for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Eagle UltraGrip +14
    56
    Why this score
    SourceEagle UltraGripiceGUARD iG51v
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7249

    Eagle UltraGrip: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle UltraGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle UltraGripiceGUARD iG51v
    Reviews found online74–
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle UltraGrip vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle UltraGripYokohama iceGUARD iG51v
Relative Score 72 70
Dry 71 71
Wet 76 78
Snow – 74
Comfort 68 70
Noise – 63
Treadwear 70 56
Handling (owners) 74 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Eagle UltraGrip

± 8

iceGUARD iG51v

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle UltraGrip

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability even on high-torque vehicles
  • Significant improvement in winter traction for rear-wheel drive cars
  • Quiet operation comparable to premium summer tires

Cons

  • Performance in deep snow is considered average compared to modern winter tire designs
  • Older tread pattern design compared to current market offerings
  • Run-flat variants may have specific handling characteristics that some drivers find less refined
All owner themes in the Eagle UltraGrip review

Tire B iceGUARD iG51v

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle UltraGrip B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
CategoryWinterPremium Touring Winter tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Tread depth—13/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle UltraGrip

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v

Narrow edge: Goodyear Eagle UltraGrip — better treadwear. Where the Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Goodyear Eagle UltraGrip rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle UltraGrip scores 70 vs 56 on treadwear.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle UltraGrip
Tire B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle UltraGrip or iceGUARD iG51v?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle UltraGrip or iceGUARD iG51v?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle UltraGrip or iceGUARD iG51v?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle UltraGrip or iceGUARD iG51v?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Eagle UltraGrip or iceGUARD iG51v?

Goodyear Eagle UltraGrip, 70 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology