Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 19 road tests and 16,823 + 3,382 owner reviews. How we score

EfficientGrip Performance is ahead, 73–68

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
± 7

Tests 73 · 6 tests Owners 72 · 16,823 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I must admit to raising the preasures when on a long run and / or loaded up for European jaunt 2.2 bar front 2.4 bar rear Im going to pump em up a bit now and see what it drives like empty”

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Tire BHankook

Ventus S1 evo3

Summer

± 6

Tests 77 · 19 tests Owners 57 · 3,382 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)

“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 78

    Dry

    EfficientGrip Performance +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 18 tests8086
    Reviews found online7460

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 79.9 + 40% × 74.2 = 78

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.6 + 40% × 59.9 = 75

  2. 79

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo3 +2
    81
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 18 tests7990
    Reviews found online7968

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 79 + 40% × 78.5 = 79

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 89.7 + 40% × 68 = 81

  3. 69

    Comfort

    EfficientGrip Performance +10
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests6164
    Reviews found online7456

    EfficientGrip Performance: 40% × 60.6 + 60% × 74.3 = 69

    Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.3 + 60% × 55.7 = 59

  4. 69

    Noise

    Ventus S1 evo3 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 14 tests7177
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 69

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 73

    No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip Performance or Ventus S1 evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 64

    Treadwear

    EfficientGrip Performance +11
    53
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests6461
    Reviews found online6441

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 64 + 40% × 63.5 = 64

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.8 + 40% × 41.4 = 53

  6. 72

    Handling (owners)

    EfficientGrip Performance +13
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceVentus S1 evo3
    Reviews found online7259
  7. 79

    Efficiency

    EfficientGrip Performance +11
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 15 tests7968
Scores at a glance
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear EfficientGrip PerformanceHankook Ventus S1 evo3
Relative Score 73 68
Dry 78 75
Wet 79 81
Comfort 69 59
Noise 69 73
Treadwear 64 53
Handling (owners) 72 59
Efficiency 79 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

EfficientGrip Performance

± 6

Ventus S1 evo3

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEfficientGrip PerformanceVentus S1 evo3ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% #5/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 96% #7/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #9/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 98% #7/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 89% #4/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 60% #8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 99% #2/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 98% #8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 98% #4/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 94% #6/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 100% #2/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 100% #1/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 80% #3/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 70% #9/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 100% #2/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #7/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 100% #1/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 70% #15/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 56% #13/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 97% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 97% #3/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 74% #4/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 74% #6/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #9/20 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test #14/20 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 56% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 58% #15/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #8/8 2023 Autoklub ČR Premium Summer Tire Test R16 #6/8 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EfficientGrip Performance

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth driving dynamics
  • Significantly reduced road noise compared to competitors
  • Strong wet and dry weather traction with great aquaplaning resistance

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to noticeable body roll and a 'squishy' or vague steering feel during spirited cornering
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some drivers
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage, bulging, or punctures from potholes
All owner themes in the EfficientGrip Performance review

Tire B Ventus S1 evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
  • Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

Positive

Community feedback on the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance is generally favorable, with drivers highlighting quiet road noise, good comfort, and solid wet and dry grip. Some users raise concerns regarding sidewall vulnerability and potential long-term cracking, while others inquire about variations in tread patterns.

subaruforester.org ·2015-04-23

“I must admit to raising the preasures when on a long run and / or loaded up for European jaunt 2.2 bar front 2.4 bar rear Im going to pump em up a bit now and see what it drives like empty”

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-16

“GOODYEAR EfficientGrip Performance 205/55 R17 91V - reliability and resistance to damage question Hello guys! I'm driving Skoda Octavia. not a racer, just a usual 40yo man. I have a set of GOODYEAR EfficientGrip Performance 205/55 R17 91V on the car, and during the last 2 months I lost three tires, all the same way - pothole on the road, visibly small, front right wheel, instantly deflates, and a hole in tire not on tread but on the side - irreparable, new tire for 130eur, repeat again. Do you by chance know if it's the pattern for the model, or am I getting EXTREMELY unlucky? Can you maybe suggest some tire models and characteristics to look into to stop this from happening? I have only 2 out of 4 original tires left, so maybe it makes sense to change the entire set. Read more”

team-bhp.com

“Wet Braking Demonstration FlexContact Tech in the EGP series tyres implies the use of a new polymer tread compound for better grip in wet road conditions: For demonstration, we again had a GLA shod with Goodyear EGP tyres. The car would do three runs on the main straight and brake to a halt on an artificially created wet patch. After each run and subsequent halt, the braking distance was recorded. The braking distances between the 3 runs on the Goodyear tyres were averaged to 24.5 meters from point of braking to an absolute halt: Thereafter, the EGP tyres were swapped for a set of Continentals to do 3 identical runs in order to draw a direct reference point: Care was taken to maintain the wet patch in identical conditions by making use of mobile mini-tankers parked along the track: Panoramic alignment gone bad! Soon enough, we had the GLA ready to take on the wet braking test with the Continental tyres. The car averaged a braking distance of 25.5 meters from point of braking to an absolute halt:”

Top themes
#low road noise#wet braking performance#dry grip and handling#sidewall durability concerns#comfort and efficiency#tread pattern variations

Based on 22 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Mixed

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Road noise levels#Tread wear and longevity#OEM fitments and EV variants#Run-flat identification confusion#Ride comfort

Based on 33 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available52110
Rim diameters14″ – 20″17″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG340 A A200 - 420 A - AA A
SidewallRaised Black Lettering - Serrated Black Lettering—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance — better handling, treadwear and efficiency. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 72 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 64 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 79 vs 68 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 69 vs 59 on comfort.

Tire A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EfficientGrip Performance or Ventus S1 evo3?

Which is better in the wet, EfficientGrip Performance or Ventus S1 evo3?

Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 81 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, EfficientGrip Performance or Ventus S1 evo3?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 78 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, EfficientGrip Performance or Ventus S1 evo3?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 73 vs 69 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EfficientGrip Performance or Ventus S1 evo3?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 69 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EfficientGrip Performance or Ventus S1 evo3?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 64 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EfficientGrip Performance or Ventus S1 evo3?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 79 vs 68 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology