Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear GT2 vs Hankook Ventus ST RH06 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 25 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus ST RH06 is ahead, 65–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear GT2
Tire AGoodyear

GT2

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 12 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Ventus ST RH06 +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceGT2Ventus ST RH06
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5565

    GT2: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59

    Ventus ST RH06: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66

    No road tests of dry for GT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Ventus ST RH06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 60

    Wet

    Ventus ST RH06 +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGT2Ventus ST RH06
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5767

    GT2: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 60

    Ventus ST RH06: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68

    No road tests of wet for GT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Ventus ST RH06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 47

    Snow

    Ventus ST RH06 +9
    56
    Why this score
    SourceGT2Ventus ST RH06
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online3247

    GT2: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 32.1 = 47

    Ventus ST RH06: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.5 = 56

    No road tests of snow for GT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Ventus ST RH06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Ventus ST RH06 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGT2Ventus ST RH06
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5161

    GT2: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 60

    Ventus ST RH06: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for GT2 or Ventus ST RH06. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGT2Ventus ST RH06
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Ventus ST RH06: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Ventus ST RH06. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGT2Ventus ST RH06
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6464

    GT2: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    Ventus ST RH06: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for GT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus ST RH06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus ST RH06 +15
    66
    Why this score
    SourceGT2Ventus ST RH06
    Reviews found online5166
Scores at a glance
Goodyear GT2 vs Hankook Ventus ST RH06: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear GT2Hankook Ventus ST RH06
Relative Score 58 65
Dry 59 66
Wet 60 68
Snow 47 56
Comfort 60 65
Noise – 68
Treadwear 65 65
Handling (owners) 51 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

GT2

Ventus ST RH06

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A GT2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and high mileage durability
  • Reliable and stable handling in dry road conditions
  • Consistent performance for daily commuting and long-distance travel

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in wet, slushy, or snowy conditions
  • High levels of road noise and cabin drone
  • Tendency for the rubber compound to crack or harden over time
All owner themes in the GT2 review

Tire B Ventus ST RH06

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear GT2 B · Hankook Ventus ST RH06
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—21
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″
Tread depth—10.5/32″
UTQG—420 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear GT2

Hankook Ventus ST RH06

Winner: Hankook Ventus ST RH06 — better handling, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear GT2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus ST RH06 scores 66 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Ventus ST RH06 scores 56 vs 47 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus ST RH06 scores 68 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus ST RH06 scores 66 vs 59 on dry.

Tire A · Goodyear GT2
Tire B · Hankook Ventus ST RH06

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

GT2 or Ventus ST RH06?

Which is better in the wet, GT2 or Ventus ST RH06?

Hankook Ventus ST RH06, 68 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, GT2 or Ventus ST RH06?

Hankook Ventus ST RH06, 66 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, GT2 or Ventus ST RH06?

Hankook Ventus ST RH06, 56 vs 47 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, GT2 or Ventus ST RH06?

Hankook Ventus ST RH06, 65 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, GT2 or Ventus ST RH06?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology