Tests – · none yet Owners 36 · 13 reviews
Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 10 road tests and 13 + 66 owner reviews. How we score
Winter Sottozero 3 is ahead, 74–47
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 10 tests Owners 81 · 66 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
47
Dry
Winter Sottozero 3 +3077Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Winter Sottozero 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests ≈ 54 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 35 82 Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 54.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.3 = 47
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 82.3 = 77
No road tests of dry for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
50
Wet
Winter Sottozero 3 +3383Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Winter Sottozero 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 55 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 42 87 Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 41.8 = 50
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 80.7 + 40% × 87.4 = 83
No road tests of wet for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
42
Snow
Winter Sottozero 3 +2466Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Winter Sottozero 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 53 (est.) 57 Reviews found online 24 79 Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 53.4 (est.) + 40% × 24.2 = 42
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 56.8 + 40% × 79.2 = 66
No road tests of snow for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
51
Comfort
Winter Sottozero 3 +2374Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Winter Sottozero 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 43 76 Ultra Grip Performance 2: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 42.8 = 51
Winter Sottozero 3: 40% × 72.3 + 60% × 75.9 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Noise
Winter Sottozero 3 +1472Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Winter Sottozero 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 44 82 Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 58
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 64.6 + 40% × 81.9 = 72
No road tests of noise for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
47
Treadwear
Winter Sottozero 3 +1764Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Winter Sottozero 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 55 (est.) 56 Reviews found online 35 75 Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 34.9 = 47
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 56.2 + 40% × 74.6 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
42
Handling (owners)
Winter Sottozero 3 +4183Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Winter Sottozero 3 Reviews found online 42 83 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison76Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Winter Sottozero 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests – 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 | Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 47 | 74 |
| Dry | 47 | 77 |
| Wet | 50 | 83 |
| Snow | 42 | 66 |
| Comfort | 51 | 74 |
| Noise | 58 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 47 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 42 | 83 |
| Efficiency | – | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ultra Grip Performance 2
Winter Sottozero 3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ultra Grip Performance 2 | Winter Sottozero 3 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/12 2011 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | #13/15 2022 Consumer Reports Winter Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ultra Grip Performance 2
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on dry and wet tarmac
- Agile handling and reliable grip in wet conditions and light-to-medium snow
- Good directional tread design for effective water and slush evacuation
Cons
- Severely lacking traction and grip on packed snow and ice according to dissatisfied users
- Triggers frequent ABS activation and wheel spin during acceleration and braking in wintry precipitation
- Vague handling feel on tarmac for certain drivers
Tire B Winter Sottozero 3
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and resistance to hydroplaning.
- Strong dry-road handling and steering precision for a winter tire.
- Excellent traction and stability in snow and slush.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, particularly if driven in temperatures above 15°C or year-round.
- Susceptibility to sidewall damage and bubbling when encountering road hazards.
- Increased noise levels as the tire ages and tread depth decreases.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 | B · Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 6 | 98 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 17″ | 16″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 10/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Winner: Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 83 vs 42 on handling.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 83 vs 50 on wet.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 77 vs 47 on dry.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 66 vs 42 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Winter Sottozero 3?
Which is better in the wet, Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Winter Sottozero 3?
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 83 vs 50 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Winter Sottozero 3?
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 77 vs 47 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Winter Sottozero 3?
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 66 vs 42 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Winter Sottozero 3?
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 72 vs 58 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Winter Sottozero 3?
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 74 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Winter Sottozero 3?
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 64 vs 47 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology