tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 16 road tests and 6 + 22 owner reviews. How we score

Winter i cept evo3 leads, 78–76 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Winter i cept evo3 or UltraGrip 9+ on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear UltraGrip 9+
Tire AGoodyear

UltraGrip 9+

Winter

± 6

Tests 75 · 5 tests Owners 79 · 6 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test (ice braking)

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Tire BHankook

Winter i cept evo3

Winter

± 4

Tests 76 · 16 tests Owners 82 · 22 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Winter i cept evo3 +10
    78
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip 9+Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 12 tests6076
    Reviews found online7982

    UltraGrip 9+: 60% × 60.1 + 40% × 79.3 = 68

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 82.2 = 78

  2. 85

    Wet

    Winter i cept evo3 +5
    90
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip 9+Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 16 tests8793
    Reviews found online8386

    UltraGrip 9+: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 83.4 = 85

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 86.4 = 90

  3. 80

    Snow

    Level
    80
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip 9+Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 16 tests8580
    Reviews found online7480

    UltraGrip 9+: 60% × 84.7 + 40% × 74.1 = 80

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 80 + 40% × 80.1 = 80

  4. 76

    Comfort

    UltraGrip 9+ +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip 9+Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7770
    Reviews found online7574

    UltraGrip 9+: 40% × 76.8 + 60% × 74.7 = 76

    Winter i cept evo3: 40% × 70.2 + 60% × 73.9 = 72

  5. 69

    Noise

    UltraGrip 9+ +36
    33
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip 9+Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 12 tests7110
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    UltraGrip 9+: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 10 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 33

    No owner ratings of noise for UltraGrip 9+ or Winter i cept evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    Winter i cept evo3 +3
    78
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip 9+Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests7177
    Reviews found online8181

    UltraGrip 9+: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 81.4 = 75

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 80.7 = 78

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Winter i cept evo3 +7
    81
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip 9+Winter i cept evo3
    Reviews found online7481
  8. 78

    Efficiency

    UltraGrip 9+ +11
    67
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip 9+Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 12 tests7867
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear UltraGrip 9+Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Relative Score 76 78
Dry 68 78
Wet 85 90
Snow 80 80
Comfort 76 72
Noise 69 33
Treadwear 75 78
Handling (owners) 74 81
Efficiency 78 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

UltraGrip 9+

± 4

Winter i cept evo3

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryUltraGrip 9+Winter i cept evo3ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 92% #13/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 95% #9/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #9/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test 98% #9/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 97% #4/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 100% #1/11 · 2023 Sports Cars Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% #2/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 94% #11/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 95% #4/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 96% #7/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 91% #9/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 97% #6/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #3/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test 97% #9/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Braking Snow 100% #1/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 87% #21/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 100% #2/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 95% #13/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 97% #4/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test 100% #3/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 97% #7/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 94% #13/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 100% #2/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test 91% #13/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 99% #5/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 93% #30/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Abrasion Treadwear 69% #11/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 89% #4/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 78% #6/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 89% #3/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 98% #3/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 98% #10/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 96% #2/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test 87% #13/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 77% #4/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test 90% #3/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #7/20 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test #9/20 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 79% #10/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 79% #4/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #3/16 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test #4/31 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A UltraGrip 9+

Pros

  • Excellent wet and cold weather grip
  • High levels of ride comfort and low noise
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Performance on deep snow and ice may lag slightly behind specialized winter-focused brands like Nokian
  • Limited feedback on long-term tread wear due to low mileage in current reviews
  • Increased noise levels specifically on concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the UltraGrip 9+ review

Tire B Winter i cept evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and outstanding aquaplaning resistance
  • Outstanding snow and ice traction providing high confidence in winter storms
  • Great value for money compared to Tier-1 brands like Michelin or Goodyear

Cons

  • Slightly increased noise levels or humming compared to summer tires
  • Mixed feedback on ride comfort, with some finding them stiffer
  • Longer braking distances reported by a few users in specific conditions
All owner themes in the Winter i cept evo3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1986
Rim diameters14″ – 16″17″ – 22″
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear UltraGrip 9+

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Narrow edge: Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — better dry, handling and wet. Pick the Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ if noise, efficiency and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ scores 69 vs 33 on noise.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ scores 78 vs 67 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 78 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 81 vs 74 on handling.

Tire A · Goodyear UltraGrip 9+
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

UltraGrip 9+ or Winter i cept evo3?

Which is better in the wet, UltraGrip 9+ or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 90 vs 85 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, UltraGrip 9+ or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 78 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, UltraGrip 9+ or Winter i cept evo3?

Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 80 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, UltraGrip 9+ or Winter i cept evo3?

Goodyear UltraGrip 9+, 69 vs 33 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, UltraGrip 9+ or Winter i cept evo3?

Goodyear UltraGrip 9+, 76 vs 72 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, UltraGrip 9+ or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 78 vs 75 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, UltraGrip 9+ or Winter i cept evo3?

Goodyear UltraGrip 9+, 78 vs 67 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology