Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic vs Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 3 + 7 road tests and 4 + 50 owner reviews. How we score

Winter i*cept RS2 is ahead, 76–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Tests 74 · 3 tests Owners 51 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2
Tire BHankook

Winter i*cept RS2

Winter

Tests 78 · 7 tests Owners 71 · 50 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (wet handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    Winter i*cept RS2 +13
    73
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*cept RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 5 tests7375
    Reviews found online4270

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 42.2 = 60

    Winter i*cept RS2: 60% × 75 + 40% × 69.9 = 73

  2. 65

    Wet

    Winter i*cept RS2 +18
    83
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*cept RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 7 tests7488
    Reviews found online5275

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 52.1 = 65

    Winter i*cept RS2: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 75.3 = 83

  3. 72

    Snow

    Winter i*cept RS2 +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*cept RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 7 tests7480
    Reviews found online6868

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 67.9 = 72

    Winter i*cept RS2: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 68.1 = 75

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Winter i*cept RS2 +17
    72
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*cept RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)75
    Reviews found online4167

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.2 = 55

    Winter i*cept RS2: 60% × 75.1 + 40% × 66.6 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for UltraGrip Ice Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*cept RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–56
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Winter i*cept RS2: 60% × 56.4 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i*cept RS2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Winter i*cept RS2 +19
    73
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*cept RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 59 (est.)74
    Reviews found online4571

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.1 = 54

    Winter i*cept RS2: 60% × 73.5 + 40% × 71.1 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for UltraGrip Ice Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    Winter i*cept RS2 +22
    71
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*cept RS2
    Reviews found online4971
Scores at a glance
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic vs Hankook Winter i*cept RS2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear UltraGrip Ice ArcticHankook Winter i*cept RS2
Relative Score 62 76
Dry 60 73
Wet 65 83
Snow 72 75
Comfort 55 72
Noise – 61
Treadwear 54 73
Handling (owners) 49 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Winter i*cept RS2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*cept RS2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #3/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test 98% #3/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 80% #2/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test 80% #3/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% #2/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 97% #2/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test 96% #2/49 · 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #2/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 93% #5/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test 97% #7/35 · 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 94% #7/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 96% #4/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test 97% #8/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 94% #7/8 · 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test 77% #18/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #4/5 2021 Test World Winter Studded Tire Test R17 #3/49 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Pros

  • Excellent traction and handling on packed snow
  • Strong performance on ice during the first two seasons
  • Reliable winter grip in extreme arctic conditions

Cons

  • Significant stud loss after two seasons of use
  • Abrupt and dangerous decline in grip performance by the third year
  • Poor longevity relative to competitors despite remaining tread depth
All owner themes in the UltraGrip Ice Arctic review

Tire B Winter i*cept RS2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and handling on wet and dry roads
  • Impressive resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain or standing water
  • Strong value for money with a competitive price point

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise, especially at highway speeds
  • Firm, stiff sidewalls leading to a less comfortable or harsh ride
  • Subpar performance and unpredictable grip on ice and black ice
All owner themes in the Winter i*cept RS2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic B · Hankook Winter i*cept RS2
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—37
Rim diameters—13″ – 17″

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2

Winner: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 scores 71 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 scores 73 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 scores 83 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 scores 72 vs 55 on comfort.

Tire A · Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*cept RS2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Winter i*cept RS2?

Which is better in the wet, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Winter i*cept RS2?

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2, 83 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Winter i*cept RS2?

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2, 73 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Winter i*cept RS2?

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2, 75 vs 72 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Winter i*cept RS2?

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2, 72 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Winter i*cept RS2?

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2, 73 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology