Tests – · none yet Owners – · 3 reviews (needs 5)
Head-to-head
Updated
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice+ vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 16 road tests and 3 + 22 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 16 tests Owners 82 · 22 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison78Why this score
Source UltraGrip Ice+ Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests – 76 Reviews found online – 82 Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 82.2 = 78
-
–
Wet
No comparison90Why this score
Source UltraGrip Ice+ Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 16 tests – 93 Reviews found online – 86 Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 86.4 = 90
-
–
Snow
No comparison80Why this score
Source UltraGrip Ice+ Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 16 tests – 80 Reviews found online – 80 Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 80 + 40% × 80.1 = 80
-
–
Comfort
No comparison72Why this score
Source UltraGrip Ice+ Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 70 Reviews found online – 74 Winter i cept evo3: 40% × 70.2 + 60% × 73.9 = 72
-
–
Noise
No comparison33Why this score
Source UltraGrip Ice+ Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests – 10 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 10 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 33
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison78Why this score
Source UltraGrip Ice+ Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 77 Reviews found online – 81 Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 80.7 = 78
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison81Why this score
Source UltraGrip Ice+ Winter i cept evo3 Reviews found online – 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison67Why this score
Source UltraGrip Ice+ Winter i cept evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests – 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear UltraGrip Ice+ | Hankook Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 78 |
| Dry | – | 78 |
| Wet | – | 90 |
| Snow | – | 80 |
| Comfort | – | 72 |
| Noise | – | 33 |
| Treadwear | – | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
UltraGrip Ice+
78
/ 100
Winter i cept evo3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A UltraGrip Ice+
Pros
- Outstanding traction and stability on snow-covered and icy roads
- Exceptional tread longevity, with reports of effective performance over multiple seasons
- Predictable handling in challenging winter cornering and bends
Cons
- Noticeable road noise during the initial break-in period on dry pavement
- Performance may feel less optimal on dry roads compared to dedicated summer or all-season tires
Tire B Winter i cept evo3
Pros
- Exceptional wet grip and outstanding aquaplaning resistance
- Outstanding snow and ice traction providing high confidence in winter storms
- Great value for money compared to Tier-1 brands like Michelin or Goodyear
Cons
- Slightly increased noise levels or humming compared to summer tires
- Mixed feedback on ride comfort, with some finding them stiffer
- Longer braking distances reported by a few users in specific conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear UltraGrip Ice+ | B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 16 | 86 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 17″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice+
78
/ 100
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Only Hankook Winter i cept evo3 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Goodyear UltraGrip Ice+
Tire B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology