tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 8 + 14 road tests and 3,043 + 126 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 3 K125 is ahead, 76–70

Check price on Amazon · Ventus Prime 3 K125 or Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
Tire AGoodyear

Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

All Season

± 5

Tests 76 · 8 tests Owners 67 · 3,043 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Tire BHankook

Ventus Prime 3 K125

Summer

± 6

Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 75 · 126 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 53 in 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +28
    85
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 12 tests5789
    Reviews found online5879
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–284%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%99%

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 56.9 + 40% × 58.1 = 57

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 88.6 + 40% × 78.8 = 85

  2. 82

    Wet

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 +2
    80
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 12 tests8881
    Reviews found online7377
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–292%95%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–194%93%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%94%

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 87.9 + 40% × 72.6 = 82

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 81.4 + 40% × 77 = 80

  3. 78

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests84–
    Reviews found online67–

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 84.3 + 40% × 67.3 = 78

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 68 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6672

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.2 = 67

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 40% × 75.1 + 60% × 71.9 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Vector 4Seasons Gen-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 72

    Noise

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 6 tests7580
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0100%100%

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 75.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 79.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74

    No owner ratings of noise for Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Ventus Prime 3 K125. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 5 tests7761
    Reviews found online7072

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 70.3 = 74

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 61 + 40% × 71.8 = 65

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +12
    75
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Reviews found online6375
  8. 74

    Efficiency

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 8 tests7466
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–185%86%
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Relative Score 70 76
Dry 57 85
Wet 82 80
Snow 78 –
Comfort 67 73
Noise 72 74
Treadwear 74 65
Handling (owners) 63 75
Efficiency 74 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

± 6

Ventus Prime 3 K125

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 finished ahead 2 times and Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryVector 4Seasons Gen-2Ventus Prime 3 K125ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 84% 98% −14.3 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Dry Handling Dry 96% 99% −3.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 92% 95% −2.7 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Braking Wet 94% 93% +1.2 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling Wet 97% 94% +3.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Noise Noise 100% 100% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 85% 86% −0.7 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 59% 94% −34.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #3/9 #8/9 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and safety in wet, rainy, and standing water conditions
  • Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow, ice, and cold winter weather
  • Comfortable, smooth, and relatively quiet ride quality

Cons

  • Reduced dry-weather performance and softer handling response in warm temperatures (above 20°C)
  • Prone to wheel spin, understeer, and tread squal when pushed hard or during aggressive starts in dry conditions
  • Vague or floaty steering feel on twisty roads or at highway speeds
All owner themes in the Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 review

Tire B Ventus Prime 3 K125

Pros

  • Excellent dry road grip and braking performance
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Comfortable ride quality with effective vibration absorption

Cons

  • Increased risk of hydroplaning as tread depth decreases
  • Accelerated tread wear on heavier vehicles or under high-torque conditions
  • Noise levels can increase noticeably after several thousand miles
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 3 K125 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 B · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3460
Rim diameters13″ – 20″15″ – 20″
UTQG—240 - 500 A - AA A - B
Sizes in common1818

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — better dry, handling and comfort. Pick the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 if treadwear and efficiency matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 85 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 75 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 scores 74 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 scores 74 vs 66 on efficiency.

Tire A · Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Which is better in the wet, Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Neither, by our numbers: 82 vs 80 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 85 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 73 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2, 74 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2, 74 vs 66 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology