Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 8 + 0 road tests and 3,033 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 is ahead, 70–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
Tire AGoodyear

Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

All Season

Tests 75 · 8 tests Owners 67 · 3,033 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests57≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6058

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 57.1 + 40% × 60 = 58

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 81

    Wet

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 +24
    57
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests87≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7353

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 87 + 40% × 72.9 = 81

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 77

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests84–
    Reviews found online68–

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 83.6 + 40% × 67.8 = 77

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6862

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 69

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests75–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for Vector 4Seasons Gen-2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 +8
    65
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests75≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6964

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 69.1 = 73

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 +6
    58
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4Seasons Gen-2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online6458
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 70 61
Dry 58 61
Wet 81 57
Snow 77 –
Comfort 69 65
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 73 65
Handling (owners) 64 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and safety in wet, rainy, and standing water conditions
  • Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow, ice, and cold winter weather
  • Comfortable, smooth, and relatively quiet ride quality

Cons

  • Reduced dry-weather performance and softer handling response in warm temperatures (above 20°C)
  • Prone to wheel spin, understeer, and tread squal when pushed hard or during aggressive starts in dry conditions
  • Vague or floaty steering feel on twisty roads or at highway speeds
All owner themes in the Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available34—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 — better wet, treadwear and handling. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth if dry matters most to you. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 scores 81 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 scores 73 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 scores 64 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2, 81 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 61 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2, 73 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology