Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 39 + 2 road tests and 3,147 + 0 owner reviews. How we score
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 is ahead, 81–71
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 39 tests Owners 77 · 3,147 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (snow braking)
“After my last post , I went out and got a set of Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 XL All Season tyres, for my Yaris.”
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners – · none yet
Best test result: #2 of 14 in 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | Cinturato All Season SF |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 37 / 2 tests | 73 | 82 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | ≈ 74 (est.) |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 95% | 100% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 98% |
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 72.2 = 73
Cinturato All Season SF: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 73.7 (est.) = 79
No owner ratings of dry for Cinturato All Season SF. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | Cinturato All Season SF |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 37 / 2 tests | 90 | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 82 | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 96% | 96% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 | 96% | 88% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 96% |
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3: 60% × 89.6 + 40% × 81.8 = 87
Cinturato All Season SF: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 71.8 (est.) = 72
No owner ratings of wet for Cinturato All Season SF. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | Cinturato All Season SF |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / 1 tests | 85 | 54 |
| Reviews found online | 74 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 93% | 83% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 93% |
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3: 60% × 84.5 + 40% × 73.5 = 80
Cinturato All Season SF: 60% × 53.8 + 40% × 65.2 (est.) = 58
No owner ratings of snow for Cinturato All Season SF. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | Cinturato All Season SF |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests | 84 | – |
| Reviews found online | 74 | – |
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3: 40% × 84.1 + 60% × 74.3 = 78
| Source | Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | Cinturato All Season SF |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / 1 tests | 73 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 99% |
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71
Cinturato All Season SF: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 or Cinturato All Season SF. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | Cinturato All Season SF |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 1 tests | 90 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 97% | 80% |
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3: 60% × 89.8 + 40% × 78.1 = 85
Cinturato All Season SF: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 68.1 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of treadwear for Cinturato All Season SF. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | Cinturato All Season SF |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 76 | – |
| Source | Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | Cinturato All Season SF |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / 1 tests | 77 | 75 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 98% | 98% |
| Category | Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 71 |
| Dry | 73 | 79 |
| Wet | 87 | 72 |
| Snow | 80 | 58 |
| Comfort | 78 | – |
| Noise | 71 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 85 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | – |
| Efficiency | 77 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Cinturato All Season SF
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 finished ahead 2 times and Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | Cinturato All Season SF | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% | 100% | −4.3 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 All Season Tyre Market Overview - 32 Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 98% | +1.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 96% | 96% | +0.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% | 88% | +7.6 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 All Season Tyre Market Overview - 32 Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% | 96% | +3.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 93% | 83% | +9.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 99% | 93% | +5.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Noise | Noise | 99% | 99% | +0.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 97% | 80% | +16.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 98% | 98% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #1/14 | #2/14 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Value | Cost | 93% | 81% | +12.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/31 | #7/31 | – | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 All Season Tyre Market Overview - 32 Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community discussion is small and mostly consists of questions from prospective buyers. Some see the tire as a balanced all-season option with better wet performance than rivals, and a few have bought it for a Yaris, a Model Y and similar cars. Others are unsure about its winter capability, its tread wear indicators and its mixed M+S and 3PMSF markings, and one user reports that older all-season tires can get skiddy in the wet after 2–3 years.
“Am I ready wear indicator correctly? I have 4 seasons tires on my car and it seems to have two wear indicators, but I'm not totally sure. The snowflakes (blue) align with one and the Goodyear shoes (red) with another. I believe the snowflakes one tells me until which point the tire is winter rated, and the other one tells when the tire is totally dead. Am I right? The tire is a Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3. Couldn't find anything on the internet to confirm. Read more”
“After my last post , I went out and got a set of Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 XL All Season tyres, for my Yaris.”
Based on 7 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | B · Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 99 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 22″ | — |
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF
Winner: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF if dry matters most to you.
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 scores 80 vs 58 on snow.
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 scores 87 vs 72 on wet.
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 scores 85 vs 70 on treadwear.
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF scores 79 vs 73 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3, 87 vs 72 on our wet score.
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF, 79 vs 73 on our dry score.
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3, 80 vs 58 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3, 85 vs 70 on our treadwear score.
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 75 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
