Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons vs Kumho Solus HA31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 63 + 18 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Vector 4Seasons and Solus HA31 are level at 73.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus HA31
Tire BKumho

Solus HA31

All Season

± 7

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 77 · 18 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 10 in 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Vector 4Seasons +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4SeasonsSolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 70 (est.)64
    Reviews found online7377

    Vector 4Seasons: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    Solus HA31: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 77.4 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Vector 4Seasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Solus HA31 +2
    79
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4SeasonsSolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 75 (est.)76
    Reviews found online7983

    Vector 4Seasons: 60% × 75.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.7 = 77

    Solus HA31: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 83.3 = 79

    No road tests of wet for Vector 4Seasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Solus HA31 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4SeasonsSolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)66
    Reviews found online6880

    Vector 4Seasons: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    Solus HA31: 60% × 65.7 + 40% × 79.9 = 71

    No road tests of snow for Vector 4Seasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Solus HA31 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4SeasonsSolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7375

    Vector 4Seasons: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 73.1 = 72

    Solus HA31: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 75.1 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Vector 4Seasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Solus HA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4SeasonsSolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–72
    Reviews found online–73

    Solus HA31: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 72.7 = 72

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4SeasonsSolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)72
    Reviews found online7672

    Vector 4Seasons: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 72

    Solus HA31: 60% × 71.8 + 40% × 71.8 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Vector 4Seasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 76

    Handling (owners)

    Solus HA31 +2
    78
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4SeasonsSolus HA31
    Reviews found online7678
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceVector 4SeasonsSolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–63
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons vs Kumho Solus HA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Vector 4SeasonsKumho Solus HA31
Relative Score 73 73
Dry 71 69
Wet 77 79
Snow 69 71
Comfort 72 73
Noise – 72
Treadwear 72 72
Handling (owners) 76 78
Efficiency – 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Vector 4Seasons

± 7

Solus HA31

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Goodyear Vector 4Seasons finished ahead 1 times and Kumho Solus HA31 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryVector 4SeasonsSolus HA31ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/10 #8/10 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2014 All Season Tyre Test · 185/60 R15

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Vector 4Seasons

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and confidence in snow and icy conditions.
  • Strong performance in heavy rain and wet road environments.
  • High durability and tread life for many users.

Cons

  • Increased road noise, often described as a 'humming' or 'bearing-like' sound.
  • Softened handling and reduced precision during high-temperature summer months.
  • Reports of premature wear or tread chunking in specific high-performance or heavy-load applications.
All owner themes in the Vector 4Seasons review

Tire B Solus HA31

Pros

  • Excellent snow and winter weather traction
  • Strong grip and stability on wet and dry roads
  • High value and competitive pricing compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Tires can feel slightly soft in warmer weather conditions
  • Mixed feedback regarding dry performance compared to dedicated summer options
All owner themes in the Solus HA31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Vector 4Seasons B · Kumho Solus HA31
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1729
Rim diameters14″ – 19″13″ – 18″
Tread depth9/32″10/32″
UTQG500 A A420 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi
Sizes in common55

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons

Kumho Solus HA31

Too close to call: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons and Kumho Solus HA31 are within 2 points overall.

Tire A · Goodyear Vector 4Seasons
Tire B · Kumho Solus HA31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vector 4Seasons or Solus HA31?

Which is better in the wet, Vector 4Seasons or Solus HA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 79 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Vector 4Seasons or Solus HA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Vector 4Seasons or Solus HA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Vector 4Seasons or Solus HA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Vector 4Seasons or Solus HA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology