Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus HA31 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 4 road tests and 18 + 2,560 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 84–74

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus HA31
Tire AKumho

Solus HA31

All Season

± 7

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 18 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 10 in 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

± 5

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 83 · 2,560 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I also live in Michigan and we get plenty of all four seasons. I put CC2s on my 2017 RAV4 Hybrid. They have handled all weather conditions up to and including moderate snow with aplomb. If I had to buy new tires tomorrow, I'd get another set.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +18
    87
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests6486
    Reviews found online7889

    Solus HA31: 60% × 63.7 + 40% × 78 = 69

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.8 + 40% × 88.7 = 87

  2. 79

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +5
    84
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests7684
    Reviews found online8485

    Solus HA31: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 83.6 = 79

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 84 + 40% × 84.9 = 84

  3. 72

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +19
    91
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests6698
    Reviews found online8080

    Solus HA31: 60% × 65.8 + 40% × 80.4 = 72

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.6 + 40% × 80.4 = 91

  4. 74

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +12
    86
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 70 (est.)82
    Reviews found online7688

    Solus HA31: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 75.7 = 74

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 82.3 + 60% × 88.3 = 86

    No road tests of comfort for Solus HA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 73

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +4
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7383
    Reviews found online73≈ 67 (est.)

    Solus HA31: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 73 = 73

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 77

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Solus HA31 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7273

    Solus HA31: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 71.7 = 72

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +11
    89
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Reviews found online7889
  8. 63

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +24
    87
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests6387
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus HA31 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus HA31Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Relative Score 74 84
Dry 69 87
Wet 79 84
Snow 72 91
Comfort 74 86
Noise 73 77
Treadwear 72 70
Handling (owners) 78 89
Efficiency 63 87

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Solus HA31

± 5

CrossClimate 2 SUV

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategorySolus HA31CrossClimate 2 SUVΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 90% #12/31 · 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 97% #9/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 95% #7/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 94% #6/31 · 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview 99% #3/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #8/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 92% #6/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 97% #8/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 100% #1/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Noise Noise 99% #3/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 100% #3/9 · 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 84% #9/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 90% #2/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #9/31 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview #1/7 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus HA31

Pros

  • Excellent snow and winter weather traction
  • Strong grip and stability on wet and dry roads
  • High value and competitive pricing compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Tires can feel slightly soft in warmer weather conditions
  • Mixed feedback regarding dry performance compared to dedicated summer options
All owner themes in the Solus HA31 review

Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Solus HA31

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community sentiment for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its exceptional grip and safety in snow, slush, and heavy rain. The primary trade-offs frequently cited are reduced fuel/range efficiency—particularly noted by EV owners—along with a premium price tag, directional rotation limitations, and mixed opinions on road noise.

r/ModelY ·4 upvotes ·2026-06-01

“New CrossClimate 2 tires almost stranded my family. Massive efficiency drop on Model Y. Just a heads-up for anyone swapping to Michelin CrossClimate 2s. Put a set on my Model Y about 3 weeks ago from Discount Tire and just did a road trip from Denver to Taos, NM with my wife and two toddlers. We charged up to 90% at the Pueblo Supercharger, and the Tesla app estimated we would arrive in Taos with 15% battery remaining. Well, the new tire efficiency hit is incredibly real. The range dropped so fast that we were tracking to hit 0% and had to make an emergency Type 2 charging stop on the way just to make sure we didn't get stranded with the kids in the car. I’m now seriously thinking about taking advantage of Discount Tire's return policy and going back to the OEM Continental ProContact RX. Has anyone else faced similar problems or massive efficiency drops when switching to the CC2s? Does the range eventually get better after a break-in period, or should I just cut my losses and swap back to the Continentals? I need something reliable for road trips with the family, so I'd love to hear your suggestions and experiences!”

r/CarTalkUK ·2 upvotes ·2024-11-07

“Opinions please ... Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV? Hi all ... I'm coming up to tyre replacement time so I've looking at what's around. Currently on Bridgestone Turanzas cos that's what came with the car, but I'm not hugely impressed with their lifespan, they seem to pick up sidewall damage easily and the tread seems to age quickly. Which is not much cop when all i do is commute round Southern England. I've pretty much settled on Michelin Primacy 4+ or Cross Climate 2 SUV but I'm having difficulty making a final decision. So I thought the hivemind might settle this: in your experience which one is best for lifespan and fuel consumption? Car is a 2018 SEAT Ateca with 18" alloys. Edit: well guys, I went with the Cross Climates, thanks for the advice!”

mbworld.org

“Quote: Originally Posted by Gitzer I think the advice on this thread is exactly right. In fact, don’t drive your new car if there is any snow or ice on the road. Get the CC2s or equivalent immediately. You are going to need them next winter anyway. Lots of people are recommending, the CCs but aren’t they all-seasons? It seems like if I’m already stuck owning Summer tires, I’m better off buying an winter set and alternating, vs owning a Summer a All Season, no? What’s killing me is no one has or can order winter tires this late in the season. it’s really frustrating that the brand new luxury car doesn’t come with all seasons, or some tires that are even safe to opperate where the vehicle was sold. Im literally going to have to rent a a car on cold days to keep my family safe ☹️”

Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Wet grip and hydroplaning resistance#EV range and fuel efficiency impact#Road noise and ride comfort#High price and premium value#Directional tread rotation limits#Treadwear and longevity

Based on 97 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus HA31 B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available2935
Rim diameters13″ – 18″17″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG420 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus HA31

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better efficiency, snow and dry. Where the Kumho Solus HA31 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 63 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 91 vs 72 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 86 vs 74 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Solus HA31
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus HA31 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Solus HA31 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 79 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus HA31 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Solus HA31 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 91 vs 72 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Solus HA31 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 77 vs 73 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Solus HA31 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 86 vs 74 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Solus HA31 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, Solus HA31 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 63 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology