Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Kumho Solus HA31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 2 road tests and 164 + 18 owner reviews. How we score

Solus HA31 is ahead, 73–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire AKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 8

Tests 56 · 2 tests Owners 76 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test (dry circle)

Kumho Solus HA31
Tire BKumho

Solus HA31

All Season

± 7

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 77 · 18 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 10 in 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Solus HA31 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Solus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests5864
    Reviews found online7678

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 58 + 40% × 76.1 = 65

    Solus HA31: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 77.6 = 69

  2. 68

    Wet

    Solus HA31 +11
    79
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Solus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests6176
    Reviews found online7883

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 60.9 + 40% × 78.2 = 68

    Solus HA31: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 83.4 = 79

  3. 52

    Snow

    Solus HA31 +19
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Solus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests4066
    Reviews found online6980

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 39.7 + 40% × 69.3 = 52

    Solus HA31: 60% × 65.7 + 40% × 79.7 = 71

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Solus HA31 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Solus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7176

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 70.9 = 70

    Solus HA31: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 75.5 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51 or Solus HA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Solus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)72
    Reviews found online7973

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 72

    Solus HA31: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 72.6 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Solus HA31 +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Solus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests5872
    Reviews found online7772

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 76.7 = 66

    Solus HA31: 60% × 71.8 + 40% × 72 = 72

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Solus HA31 +4
    78
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Solus HA31
    Reviews found online7478
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Solus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–63
Scores at a glance
Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Kumho Solus HA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Kumho Solus HA31
Relative Score 66 73
Dry 65 69
Wet 68 79
Snow 52 71
Comfort 70 73
Noise 72 72
Treadwear 66 72
Handling (owners) 74 78
Efficiency – 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HT51

± 7

Solus HA31

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrugen HT51Solus HA31ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 94% #7/9 · 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test 90% #12/31 · 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 91% #8/9 · 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test 94% #6/31 · 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 94% #9/9 · 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test 95% #8/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 82% #23/30 · 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test 92% #6/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 86% #8/9 · 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test 97% #8/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #9/30 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test #9/31 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Tire B Solus HA31

Pros

  • Excellent snow and winter weather traction
  • Strong grip and stability on wet and dry roads
  • High value and competitive pricing compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Tires can feel slightly soft in warmer weather conditions
  • Mixed feedback regarding dry performance compared to dedicated summer options
All owner themes in the Solus HA31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Kumho Solus HA31
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4429
Rim diameters15″ – 22″13″ – 18″
Tread depth12.5/32″10/32″
UTQG720 A A420 A A
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HT51

Kumho Solus HA31

Winner: Kumho Solus HA31 — better snow, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 71 vs 52 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 79 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 72 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 69 vs 65 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire B · Kumho Solus HA31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HT51 or Solus HA31?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or Solus HA31?

Kumho Solus HA31, 79 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or Solus HA31?

Kumho Solus HA31, 69 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HT51 or Solus HA31?

Kumho Solus HA31, 71 vs 52 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Crugen HT51 or Solus HA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or Solus HA31?

Kumho Solus HA31, 73 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or Solus HA31?

Kumho Solus HA31, 72 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology