Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 210 + 2,560 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 83–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

± 5

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 83 · 2,560 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I also live in Michigan and we get plenty of all four seasons. I put CC2s on my 2017 RAV4 Hybrid. They have handled all weather conditions up to and including moderate snow with aplomb. If I had to buy new tires tomorrow, I'd get another set.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +15
    87
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo 3 evCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 71 (est.)86
    Reviews found online7489

    Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 72

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.8 + 40% × 88.7 = 87

    No road tests of dry for Ventus S1 evo 3 ev. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +12
    84
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo 3 evCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 72 (est.)84
    Reviews found online7385

    Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 72

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 84 + 40% × 84.9 = 84

    No road tests of wet for Ventus S1 evo 3 ev. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    91
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo 3 evCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–98
    Reviews found online–80

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.6 + 40% × 80.4 = 91

  4. 68

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +18
    86
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo 3 evCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)82
    Reviews found online6788

    Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.1 = 68

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 82.3 + 60% × 88.3 = 86

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 evo 3 ev. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo 3 evCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–83
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 77

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Ventus S1 evo 3 ev +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo 3 evCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7473

    Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 71

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo 3 ev. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +16
    89
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo 3 evCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Reviews found online7389
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    87
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo 3 evCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–87
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus S1 evo 3 evMichelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Relative Score 72 83
Dry 72 87
Wet 72 84
Snow – 91
Comfort 68 86
Noise – 77
Treadwear 71 70
Handling (owners) 73 89
Efficiency – 87

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ventus S1 evo 3 ev

± 5

CrossClimate 2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus S1 evo 3 ev

Pros

  • Excellent grip and handling in both dry and wet conditions
  • Low road noise and quiet operation suitable for EVs
  • Responsive steering with solid cornering stability and short braking distances

Cons

  • High purchase price relative to some expectations
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some high-torque EV drivers
  • Stiffer ride quality that can feel bouncy or noisy on rough roads
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo 3 ev review

Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community sentiment for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its exceptional grip and safety in snow, slush, and heavy rain. The primary trade-offs frequently cited are reduced fuel/range efficiency—particularly noted by EV owners—along with a premium price tag, directional rotation limitations, and mixed opinions on road noise.

subaruoutback.org ·2 upvotes ·2023-04-03

“I put the CC2s on my 2016 OB about 5K miles ago. There was an immediate ~2 MPG hit for both local and highway driving, but the amazing grip, smoothness, and reduction in road noise (even compared to the excellent Michelin tires I was running prior to the CC2s) makes it worthwhile to me. I like the increased rolling resistance in local and back road driving, almost like having more engine braking. Expensive rubber though.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·1 upvote ·2025-07-21

“You got that right! Between my local tire shop and many on here claiming the CC2s was the greatest thing since the forward pass I took the plunge. Last week I took the manager for a ride at the tire shop and he said that’s the complaints he hears about them. He still thinks the noise is worth the trade off in the snow, even though we get next to none here anymore. They’ve been balanced on a hunter and road forced yet still vibrate at 80. When I swap out the CC2s for my lx 25s there’s no vibration whatsoever and next to no sound. The lx25s are one of the ugliest tires I’ve ever seen or I’d just run with them. My goal is to use the lx25s as a winter tire and get pro contacts to replace the Michelins, but, I can’t get the Michelins to wear out. Which is obviously a good thing considering they cost a grand. They went to 7-8/32nds and stalled like a brisket. Meanwhile at almost 2 yrs old they’re getting harder as everyday passes. Worst “premium” tire I’ve ever purchased!”

swedespeed.com ·2022-01-19

“We visited VT for Christmas and got quite a lot of freezing rain. My parents live on dirt roads and they weren't sanded. Crossclimate 2s on the XC90 took it all in stride. It wasn't my first choice of tire. But I didn't feel "caught with my pants down" either. In NJ we have lots of "winter" days that range from the teens to the 40's. Right now the CC2s are my summer tire and I run Blizzaks for winter. If I were to run CC2s year round, I would buy new tires in Nov, keep them for 2 years, then sell them as barely used and buy a new set. Just like with the older all-season tires, winter performance is definitely better when the tire is newer.”

Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Wet grip and hydroplaning resistance#EV range and fuel efficiency impact#Road noise and ride comfort#High price and premium value#Directional tread rotation limits#Treadwear and longevity

Based on 97 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2535
Rim diameters17″ – 22″17″ – 22″
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better comfort, handling and dry. Where the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 86 vs 68 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 73 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 72 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 84 vs 72 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus S1 evo 3 ev or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus S1 evo 3 ev or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus S1 evo 3 ev or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus S1 evo 3 ev or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 86 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus S1 evo 3 ev or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology