tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 38 + 2,201 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 65–58

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Fleva V701 or CHAMPIRO SX2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,201 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +9
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCHAMPIRO SX2ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 66 (est.)78
    Reviews found online6468

    CHAMPIRO SX2: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.7 = 74

    No road tests of dry for CHAMPIRO SX2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 58

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCHAMPIRO SX2ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 61 (est.)70
    Reviews found online5364

    CHAMPIRO SX2: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67

    No road tests of wet for CHAMPIRO SX2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 39

    Snow

    CHAMPIRO SX2 +3
    36
    Why this score
    SourceCHAMPIRO SX2ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 54 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online1712

    CHAMPIRO SX2: 60% × 53.7 (est.) + 40% × 17.2 = 39

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52.2 (est.) + 40% × 12.4 = 36

    No road tests of snow for CHAMPIRO SX2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCHAMPIRO SX2ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)62
    Reviews found online4861

    CHAMPIRO SX2: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 47.9 = 55

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for CHAMPIRO SX2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 63

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCHAMPIRO SX2ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)74
    Reviews found online5760

    CHAMPIRO SX2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 63

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 59.6 = 68

    No road tests of noise for CHAMPIRO SX2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +11
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCHAMPIRO SX2ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 61 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5259

    CHAMPIRO SX2: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for CHAMPIRO SX2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCHAMPIRO SX2ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online6772
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCHAMPIRO SX2ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryGT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 58 65
Dry 65 74
Wet 58 67
Snow 39 36
Comfort 55 61
Noise 63 68
Treadwear 58 69
Handling (owners) 67 72
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CHAMPIRO SX2

± 6

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CHAMPIRO SX2

Pros

  • Exceptional value for the price point
  • Predictable handling and excellent driver feedback at the limit
  • Strong dry traction once the tire reaches operating temperature

Cons

  • Mediocre wet weather performance with a tendency to hydroplane
  • Requires significant heat to achieve optimal grip levels
  • Increased road noise compared to standard passenger tires
All owner themes in the CHAMPIRO SX2 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Mixed

Most posts are people asking whether the V701 suits daily driving, spirited road use, or autocross. They see it as an affordable, grippy summer or performance all-season tire, and the few firsthand comments are positive: quicker turn-in, a better feel, and a stiffer sidewall without a harsher ride. Open concerns are tread life (one mechanic said it wears quickly), wet performance, and how it compares with the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and the Falken 615K+.

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
fiestastforum.com ·2022-11-30

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
Top themes
#Daily driving suitability#Tread life concerns#Value for price#Grip and handling#Wet performance#Turn-in and feel#Miata and Honda fitments#Alternatives comparison

Based on 23 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available770
Rim diameters15″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth8/32″9/32″
UTQG200 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common77

Which one should you actually buy?

GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better treadwear, dry and wet. Pick the GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 67 vs 58 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 61 vs 55 on comfort.

Tire A · GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CHAMPIRO SX2 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, CHAMPIRO SX2 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 67 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CHAMPIRO SX2 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CHAMPIRO SX2 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2, 39 vs 36 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CHAMPIRO SX2 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 68 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CHAMPIRO SX2 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 61 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CHAMPIRO SX2 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology